Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059514›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

The Benefits of emotion Regulation Interventions in Virtual Reality for the Improvement of Wellbeing in Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Jessica Isbely Montana, Marta Matamala-Gomez, Marta Maisto, Petar Aleksandrov Mavrodiev, Cesare Massimo Cavalera, Barbara Diana, Fabrizia Mantovani, Olivia Realdon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Digital Psychiatry with Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality: Recent Advances and Limitations.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica Isbely MontanaDepartment of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Marta Matamala-GomezDepartment of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Marta MaistoDepartment of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Petar Aleksandrov MavrodievDepartment of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Cesare Massimo CavaleraDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 1, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Barbara DianaDepartment of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Fabrizia MantovaniDepartment of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Olivia RealdonDepartment of Human Sciences for Education, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.

Funding

Regione Lombardia POR FESR 2014-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of emotion regulation interventions on wellbeing has been extensively documented in literature, although only in recent years virtual reality (VR) technologies have been incorporated in the design of such interventions, in both clinical and non-clinical settings. A systematic search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was therefore carried out to explore the state of the art in emotion regulation interventions for wellbeing using virtual reality. The literature on this topic was queried, 414 papers were screened, and 11 studies were included, covering adults and older adults. Our findings offer an overview of the current use of VR technologies for the enhancement of emotion regulation (ER) and wellbeing. The results are promising and suggest that VR-based emotion regulation training can facilitate the promotion of wellbeing. An overview of VR-based training interventions is crucial for better understanding how to use these tools in the clinical settings. This review offers a critical debate on the structure of such intervention protocols. It also analyzes and highlights the crucial role played by the selection of the objective and subjective wellbeing assessment measures of said intervention protocols.

Indexed as

adultsemotion regulationsystematic reviewtreatmentvirtual realitywellbeing intervention

Identifiers

PMID32059514
PMCPMC7073752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.