ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
Stylized versus voxel phantoms: a juxtaposition of organ depth distributions.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- NCIRF: an organ dose calculator for patients undergoing radiography and fluoroscopy.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2023Article
- Organ dose conversion coefficients in CT scans for Korean adult males and females.Nuclear engineering and technology · 2022Article
- Neutron Radiobiology and Dosimetry.Radiation research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
For external irradiation, the variability in organ dose estimation found between computational phantom generations arises particularly from the differences in organ positioning. This work represents the first effort to quantify the differences in organ depth below the body surface between a stylized and voxel phantom series. Herein, the revised Oak Ridge National Laboratory stylized phantom series and the University of Florida/National Cancer Institute voxel phantom series were compared. Both series include whole-body models of the newborn; the 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year-old; and the adult human. Organ depths from eight different directions applicable to external irradiation geometries were computed: antero-posterior, postero-anterior, left and right lateral, rotational, isotropic, cranial and caudal directions. Organ depths in the stylized phantoms were computed using a ray-tracing technique available through Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations in MCNP6. Organ depths in the voxel phantom were found using phantom matrix manipulation. Resultant organ depths for both series were plotted as distributions; available are twenty-four organs and two bone tissue distributions for each of six phantom ages and in each of the eight directional geometries. Quantitative data descriptors (e.g. mean and median depths) were also tabulated. For demonstration purposes, a literature review of relevant stylized versus voxel comparison works was performed to explore where the quantification of organ depth differences can provide further insight or evidence to study conclusions. The entire dataset of organ depth distributions and their data descriptors can be found in online supplementary files.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.