Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059205›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

Stylized versus voxel phantoms: a juxtaposition of organ depth distributions.

Keith T Griffin, Thomas A Cuthbert, Shaheen A Dewji, Choonsik Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neutron Radiobiology and Dosimetry.Radiation research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keith T GriffinDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9628-3791
Thomas A CuthbertDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Shaheen A DewjiDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-5877
Choonsik LeeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
National Institutes of Health · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For external irradiation, the variability in organ dose estimation found between computational phantom generations arises particularly from the differences in organ positioning. This work represents the first effort to quantify the differences in organ depth below the body surface between a stylized and voxel phantom series. Herein, the revised Oak Ridge National Laboratory stylized phantom series and the University of Florida/National Cancer Institute voxel phantom series were compared. Both series include whole-body models of the newborn; the 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year-old; and the adult human. Organ depths from eight different directions applicable to external irradiation geometries were computed: antero-posterior, postero-anterior, left and right lateral, rotational, isotropic, cranial and caudal directions. Organ depths in the stylized phantoms were computed using a ray-tracing technique available through Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations in MCNP6. Organ depths in the voxel phantom were found using phantom matrix manipulation. Resultant organ depths for both series were plotted as distributions; available are twenty-four organs and two bone tissue distributions for each of six phantom ages and in each of the eight directional geometries. Quantitative data descriptors (e.g. mean and median depths) were also tabulated. For demonstration purposes, a literature review of relevant stylized versus voxel comparison works was performed to explore where the quantification of organ depth differences can provide further insight or evidence to study conclusions. The entire dataset of organ depth distributions and their data descriptors can be found in online supplementary files.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMonte Carlo MethodRadiation DosageRadiometry

Identifiers

PMID32059205
PMCPMC13006032
OpenAlexW3006364237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.