ArticleThe American journal of managed care2020
Care coordination for veterans with COPD: a positive deviance study.
Article in The American journal of managed care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging the Positive Deviance Approach to Drive Behavior Change in Noncommunicable Diseases: A Scoping Review.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Pharmacist-Driven Inhaled Corticosteroid De-escalation in Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
- COPD CARE Academy: Design of Purposeful Training Guided by Implementation Strategies.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
- The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Jumping Through Hoops: Community Care Clinician and Staff Experiences Providing Primary Care to Rural Veterans.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Adaptations to relational facilitation for two national care coordination programs during COVID-19.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2021Article
- Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Management Across a Diverse Population of Health Care Organizations in the USA.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021Article
- Use of implementation science to qualitatively identify implementation determinants of COPD practice guidelines in primary care.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesImproving chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care and reducing hospital readmissions is an urgent healthcare system priority. However, little is known about the organizational factors that underlie intersite variation in readmission rates. Evidence from other chronic diseases points to care coordination as one such factor. STUDY
designTo understand whether intersite differences in care coordination may be one of the organizational factors contributing to the variation in readmission rates, we examined provider perspectives on COPD care at Veterans Affairs (VA) sites.
methodsIn this mixed-methods positive deviance study, we selected 3 VA sites in the lowest quartile and 3 in the highest quartile for 2016 risk-adjusted COPD readmission rates. During June to October 2017, we conducted semistructured interviews with primary and specialty care providers involved in COPD care at VA sites with low (n = 14) and high (n = 11) readmission rates.
resultsAlthough providers at all sites referenced ongoing readmission reduction initiatives, only providers at low-readmission sites described practice environments characterized by high relational coordination (ie, high-quality work relationships and high-quality communication). They also reported fewer significant structural barriers to collaboration in areas like patient volume.
conclusionsThe most notable differences between high- and low-readmission sites were related to the quality of relational coordination and the presence of structural barriers to coordination, rather than specific readmission reduction initiatives. Implementing organizational reforms aimed at enhancing relational coordination and removing structural barriers would enhance care for COPD and may improve quality of care for other chronic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.