Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059080›Full record

SynthesisNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2020

A Systematic Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Opioid Use Disorder.

Heather B Ward, Matthew J Mosquera, Joji Suzuki, Timothy Y Mariano

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Substance Use and Addiction in Athletes: The Case for Neuromodulation and Beyond.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Deep Brain Stimulation for Addictive Disorders-Where Are We Now?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather B WardDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-8004
Matthew J MosqueraDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Joji SuzukiDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5659-6147
Timothy Y MarianoDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5526-1564
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Initiating substance use disorder treatment in hospitalized opioid use disorder patientsK23DA042326 · NIDA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SUZUKI, JOJI · 2017 to 2021
$999k
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School 2017 Norman E. Zinberg Fellowship in Addiction PsychiatryNIDA NIH HHS K23 DA042326NIDA NIH HHS K23DA042326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a great public health need to identify novel treatment strategies for opioid use disorder (OUD) in order to reduce relapse and overdose. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has demonstrated preliminary effectiveness for substance use, but little is known about its use in OUD. Neuromodulation may represent a potential adjunctive treatment modality for OUD, so we conducted a systematic review to understand the state of the current research in this field.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies using noninvasive brain stimulation to affect clinical outcomes related to substance use for adults with opioid use disorder. We searched the following online databases: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost, 1872-present), and Science Citation Index Expanded (ISI Web of Science, 1945-present). All studies that measured clinical outcomes related to substance use, including cue-induced craving, were included. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Handbook.

resultsThe initial search yielded 5590 studies after duplicates were removed. After screening titles and abstracts, 14 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. Five studies were determined to meet inclusion criteria with a combined total subjects of N = 150. Given the paucity of studies and small number of total subjects, no quantitative analysis was performed. These studies used TMS (n = 3), tDCS (n = 1), and the BRIDGE device (n = 1), a noninvasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulator, to reduce cue-induced craving (n = 3), reduce clinical withdrawal symptoms (n = 1), or measure substance-use-related cortical plasticity (n = 1).

conclusionsThere is a dearth of research in the area of noninvasive brain stimulation for OUD. NIBS represents a novel treatment modality that should be further investigated for OUD.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleOpioid-Related DisordersTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAddictionnoninvasive brain stimulationopioid use disordertranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32059080
PMCPMC11528323
OpenAlexW3005611385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.