ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020
Severity Index for Suspected Arbovirus (SISA): Machine learning for accurate prediction of hospitalization in subjects suspected of arboviral infection.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- A machine learning approach for differential classification of chikungunya virus: an explainable AI study based on surveillance data.Infection · 2026Article
- Oropouche virus screening among acute febrile illness cases in Thailand: no evidence of circulation in arboviral-endemic regions.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based models for prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with dengue shock syndrome.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
- Correlates of disease severity in bluetongue as a model of acute arbovirus infection.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Diagnosis: Current Developments and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Automated Identification of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Lesions Using Deep-Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- An 8-gene machine learning model improves clinical prediction of severe dengue progression.Genome medicine · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Risk of Severe Dengue Using Intrahost Viral Population in Dengue Virus Serotype 2 PatientsFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Oropouche virus infection in patients with acute febrile syndrome: Is a predictive model based solely on signs and symptoms useful?PloS one · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Cyber-Physical System for Severity Classification of Chikungunya Disease.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2022Article
- SIMON: Open-Source Knowledge Discovery Platform.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Assessing the risk of dengue severity using demographic information and laboratory test results with machine learning.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of a diagnostic algorithm for dengue based on an artificial neural network.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDengue, chikungunya, and Zika are arboviruses of major global health concern. Decisions regarding the clinical management of suspected arboviral infection are challenging in resource-limited settings, particularly when deciding on patient hospitalization. The objective of this study was to determine if hospitalization of individuals with suspected arboviral infections could be predicted using subject intake data. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsTwo prediction models were developed using data from a surveillance study in Machala, a city in southern coastal Ecuador with a high burden of arboviral infections. Data were obtained from subjects who presented at sentinel medical centers with suspected arboviral infection (November 2013 to September 2017). The first prediction model-called the Severity Index for Suspected Arbovirus (SISA)-used only demographic and symptom data. The second prediction model-called the Severity Index for Suspected Arbovirus with Laboratory (SISAL)-incorporated laboratory data. These models were selected by comparing the prediction ability of seven machine learning algorithms; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from the prediction of a test dataset was used to select the final algorithm for each model. After eliminating those with missing data, the SISA dataset had 534 subjects, and the SISAL dataset had 98 subjects. For SISA, the best prediction algorithm was the generalized boosting model, with an AUC of 0.91. For SISAL, the best prediction algorithm was the elastic net with an AUC of 0.94. A sensitivity analysis revealed that SISA and SISAL are not directly comparable to one another. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Both SISA and SISAL were able to predict arbovirus hospitalization with a high degree of accuracy in our dataset. These algorithms will need to be tested and validated on new data from future patients. Machine learning is a powerful prediction tool and provides an excellent option for new management tools and clinical assessment of arboviral infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.