Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059011›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Effects of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene and improved complementary feeding on environmental enteric dysfunction in children in rural Zimbabwe: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Ethan K Gough, Lawrence H Moulton, Kuda Mutasa, Robert Ntozini, Rebecca J Stoltzfus, Florence D Majo, Laura E Smith, Gordana Panic, Natasa Giallourou, Mark Jamell and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Ethan K GoughDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5265-7731
Lawrence H MoultonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Kuda MutasaZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Robert NtoziniZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-2835
Rebecca J StoltzfusDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Florence D MajoZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Laura E SmithDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Gordana PanicDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Division of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Natasa GiallourouDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Division of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark JamellPain Care Specialists of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9167-0648
Peter KosekPain Care Specialists of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America.
Jonathan R SwannDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Division of Digestive Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jean H HumphreyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Andrew J PrendergastDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) Trial Team
Johns Hopkins University · USZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research · ZWImperial College London · GBCornell University · USKarolinska Institutet · SEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Effect of a sanitation & nutrition intervention on HIV-exposed infant healthR01HD060338 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREY, JEAN HAWES · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060338Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 093768/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 108065/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental enteric dysfunction (EED) may be an important modifiable cause of child stunting. We described the evolution of EED biomarkers from birth to 18 months in rural Zimbabwe and tested the independent and combined effects of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), and improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF), on EED. METHODOLOGY AND

findingsThe Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial was a 2x2 factorial cluster-randomised trial of improved IYCF and improved WASH on child stunting and anaemia at 18 months of age. 1169 infants born to HIV-negative mothers provided plasma and faecal specimens at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of age. We measured EED biomarkers that reflect all domains of the hypothesized pathological pathway. Markers of intestinal permeability and intestinal inflammation declined over time, while markers of microbial translocation and systemic inflammation increased between 1-18 months. Markers of intestinal damage (I-FABP) and repair (REG-1β) mirrored each other, and citrulline (a marker of intestinal epithelial mass) increased from 6 months of age, suggesting dynamic epithelial turnover and regeneration in response to enteric insults. We observed few effects of IYCF and WASH on EED after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The WASH intervention decreased plasma IGF-1 at 3 months (β:0.89, 95%CI:0.81,0.98) and plasma kynurenine at 12 months (β: 0.92, 95%CI:0.87,0.97), and increased plasma IGF-1 at 18 months (β:1.15, 95%CI:1.05,1.25), but these small WASH effects did not translate into improved growth.

conclusionsOverall, we observed dynamic trends in EED but few effects of IYCF or WASH on biomarkers during the first 18 months after birth, suggesting that these interventions did not impact EED. Transformative WASH interventions are required to prevent or ameliorate EED in low-income settings.

Indexed as

HygieneInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaCohort StudiesEnvironmentFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntestine, SmallMaleRural PopulationSanitationWaterWater QualityZimbabweWater

Identifiers

PMID32059011
PMCPMC7046282
OpenAlexW3006428774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.