Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059007›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification.

Craig C Kage, Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz, Mary H Foltz, Rebekah L Lawrence, Taycia L Brandon, Nathaniel E Helwig, Arin M Ellingson

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Craig C KageDivision of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-1302
Mohsen Akbari-ShandizRehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Mary H FoltzDivision of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Rebekah L LawrenceDivision of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Taycia L BrandonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-1164
Nathaniel E HelwigDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Arin M EllingsonDivision of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6154-8035

Funding

Interdisciplinary Engineering Career Development Center in Movement and Rehabilitation SciencesK12HD073945 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DEWALD, JULIUS P, REINKENSMEYER, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2021
$7.9M
Musculoskeletal Training GrantT32AR050938 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CLOHISY, DENIS R · 2004 to 2020
$3.0M
Movement-related pathogenesis of rotator cuff disease in persons with shoulder painF31HD087069 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LAWRENCE, REBEKAH L · 2016 to 2017
$86k
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR050938NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD087069NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD073945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biplane radiography and associated shape-matching provides non-invasive, dynamic, 3D osteo- and arthrokinematic analysis. Due to the complexity of data acquisition, each system should be validated for the anatomy of interest. The purpose of this study was to assess our system's acquisition methods and validate a custom, automated 2D/3D shape-matching algorithm relative to radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for the cervical and lumbar spine. Additionally, two sources of RSA error were examined via a Monte Carlo simulation: 1) static bead centroid identification and 2) dynamic bead tracking error. Tantalum beads were implanted into a cadaver for RSA and cervical and lumbar spine flexion and lateral bending were passively simulated. A bead centroid identification reliability analysis was performed and a vertebral validation block was used to determine bead tracking accuracy. Our system's overall root mean square error (RMSE) for the cervical spine ranged between 0.21-0.49mm and 0.42-1.80° and the lumbar spine ranged between 0.35-1.17mm and 0.49-1.06°. The RMSE associated with RSA ranged between 0.14-0.69mm and 0.96-2.33° for bead centroid identification and 0.25-1.19mm and 1.69-4.06° for dynamic bead tracking. The results of this study demonstrate our system's ability to accurately quantify segmental spine motion. Additionally, RSA errors should be considered when interpreting biplane validation results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotionRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsSpine

Identifiers

PMID32059007
PMCPMC7021291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.