ArticlePloS one2020
Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinematic tracking of the small bones of the wrist in sequential 3DCT and dynamic 4DCT volume images using open-source Hierarchical 3D Registration, a module within SlicerAutoscoperBiomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Less is more: downsampling x-ray images improves pose estimation accuracy.Medical engineering & physics · 2026Article
- Technologies to investigate the mechanisms of force-based manipulations: a narrative methods review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Effect of Low-Dose CT Protocols on Shoulder Model-Based Tracking accuracy Using Biplane Videoradiography.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- A super-resolution algorithm to fuse orthogonal CT volumes using OrthoFusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- OrthoFusion: A Super-Resolution Algorithm to Fuse Orthogonal CT Volumes.Research square · 2024Article
- Cervical facet capsular ligament mechanics: Estimations based on subject-specific anatomy and kinematics.JOR spine · 2023Article
- Machine learning for image analysis in the cervical spine: Systematic review of the available models and methods.Brain & spine · 2022Review
- Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biplane radiography and associated shape-matching provides non-invasive, dynamic, 3D osteo- and arthrokinematic analysis. Due to the complexity of data acquisition, each system should be validated for the anatomy of interest. The purpose of this study was to assess our system's acquisition methods and validate a custom, automated 2D/3D shape-matching algorithm relative to radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for the cervical and lumbar spine. Additionally, two sources of RSA error were examined via a Monte Carlo simulation: 1) static bead centroid identification and 2) dynamic bead tracking error. Tantalum beads were implanted into a cadaver for RSA and cervical and lumbar spine flexion and lateral bending were passively simulated. A bead centroid identification reliability analysis was performed and a vertebral validation block was used to determine bead tracking accuracy. Our system's overall root mean square error (RMSE) for the cervical spine ranged between 0.21-0.49mm and 0.42-1.80° and the lumbar spine ranged between 0.35-1.17mm and 0.49-1.06°. The RMSE associated with RSA ranged between 0.14-0.69mm and 0.96-2.33° for bead centroid identification and 0.25-1.19mm and 1.69-4.06° for dynamic bead tracking. The results of this study demonstrate our system's ability to accurately quantify segmental spine motion. Additionally, RSA errors should be considered when interpreting biplane validation results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.