Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32058997›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Macroalgal germplasm banking for conservation, food security, and industry.

Rachael Wade, Simona Augyte, Maddelyn Harden, Sergey Nuzhdin, Charles Yarish, Filipe Alberto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Skinny kelp (Journal of applied phycology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachael WadeUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-2311
Simona AugyteUniversity of Connecticut Stamford, Stamford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Maddelyn HardenUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Sergey NuzhdinUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Charles YarishUniversity of Connecticut Stamford, Stamford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Filipe AlbertoUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0593-3240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ex situ seed banking was first conceptualized and implemented in the early 20th century to maintain and protect crop lines. Today, ex situ seed banking is important for the preservation of heirloom strains, biodiversity conservation and ecosystem restoration, and diverse research applications. However, these efforts primarily target microalgae and terrestrial plants. Although some collections include macroalgae (i.e., seaweeds), they are relatively few and have yet to be connected via any international, coordinated initiative. In this piece, we provide a brief introduction to macroalgal germplasm banking and its application to conservation, industry, and mariculture. We argue that concerted effort should be made globally in germline preservation of marine algal species via germplasm banking with an overview of the technical advances for feasibility and ensured success.

Indexed as

SeaweedSeed BankAquacultureConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFood SupplyGenetic VariationGerm Cells, PlantInternational Cooperation

Identifiers

PMID32058997
PMCPMC7046291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.