Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32058674›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2020

Somatic mutations and copy number variations in breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 amplification.

Mieke R Van Bockstal, Marie Colombe Agahozo, Ronald van Marion, Peggy N Atmodimedjo, Hein F B M Sleddens, Winand N M Dinjens, Lindy L Visser, Esther H Lips, Jelle Wesseling, Carolien H M van Deurzen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Morphological intratumor heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mieke R Van BockstalDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-928X
Marie Colombe AgahozoDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald van MarionDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peggy N AtmodimedjoDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hein F B M SleddensDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Winand N M DinjensDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lindy L VisserDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther H LipsDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jelle WesselingDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carolien H M van DeurzenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intratumour heterogeneity fuels carcinogenesis and allows circumventing specific targeted therapies. HER2 gene amplification is associated with poor outcome in invasive breast cancer. Heterogeneous HER2 amplification has been described in 5-41% of breast cancers. Here, we investigated the genetic differences between HER2-positive and HER2-negative admixed breast cancer components. We performed an in-depth analysis to explore the potential heterogeneity in the somatic mutational landscape of each individual tumour component. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue of ten patients with at least one HER2-negative and at least one HER2-positive component was microdissected. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed using a customized 53-gene panel. Somatic mutations and copy number variations were analysed. Overall, the tumours showed a heterogeneous distribution of 12 deletions, 9 insertions, 32 missense variants and 7 nonsense variants in 26 different genes, which are (likely) pathogenic. Three splice site alterations were identified. One patient had an EGFR copy number gain restricted to a HER2-negative in situ component, resulting in EGFR protein overexpression. Two patients had FGFR1 copy number gains in at least one tumour component. Two patients had an 8q24 gain in at least one tumour component, resulting in a copy number increase in MYC and PVT1. One patient had a CCND1 copy number gain restricted to a HER2-negative tumour component. No common alternative drivers were identified in the HER2-negative tumour components. This series of 10 breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification illustrates that HER2 positivity is not an unconditional prerequisite for the maintenance of tumour growth. Many other molecular aberrations are likely to act as alternative or collaborative drivers. This study demonstrates that breast carcinogenesis is a dynamically evolving process characterized by a versatile somatic mutational profile, of which some genetic aberrations will be crucial for cancer progression, and others will be mere 'passenger' molecular anomalies.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansMiddle AgedMutationRetrospective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancercopy number variationsHER2 amplificationintratumour heterogeneitynext-generation sequencingsomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID32058674
PMCPMC7138394
OpenAlexW3006274661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.