ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Time-varying nodal measures with temporal community structure: A cautionary note to avoid misinterpretation.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Loneliness exacerbates age differences in the -allostatic-interoceptive system during induced affect.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- Provincial and connector qualities of somatosensory brain network hubs in bipolar disorder.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Multiple spatial scale mapping of time-resolved brain network reconfiguration during evoked pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Segregation over time in functional networks in prefrontal cortex for individuals suffering from pathological fatigue after traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Time-varying measures of cerebral network centrality correlate with visual saliency during movie watching.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Structural determinants of dynamic fluctuations between segregation and integration on the human connectome.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Time-varying nodal measures with temporal community structure: A cautionary note to avoid misinterpretation.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Brainstem Modulation of Large-Scale Intrinsic Cortical Activity Correlations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In network neuroscience, temporal network models have gained popularity. In these models, network properties have been related to cognition and behavior. Here, we demonstrate that calculating nodal properties that are dependent on temporal community structure (such as the participation coefficient [PC]) in time-varying contexts can potentially lead to misleading results. Specifically, with regards to the participation coefficient, increases in integration can be inferred when the opposite is occurring. Further, we present a temporal extension to the PC measure (temporal PC) that circumnavigates this problem by jointly considering all community partitions assigned to a node through time. The proposed method allows us to track a node's integration through time while adjusting for the possible changes in the community structure of the overall network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.