Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32058457›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Organizational Support for Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care and Workforce Outcomes.

Lusine Poghosyan, Affan Ghaffari, Jianfang Liu, Matthew D McHugh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rural-serving primary care practitioners' and cardiologists' care adaptations for cardiovascular services: A qualitative analysis.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nurse Practitioner Integration: Insights Into the Next Generation of Policy and Research.International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lusine PoghosyanLusine Poghosyan, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Stone Foundation and Elise D. Fish Associate Professor, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York. Affan Ghaffari, PhD, is Research Coordinator, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York. Jianfang Liu, PhD, is Assistant Professor of Quantitative Research, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York. Matthew D. McHugh, PhD, JD, RN, CRNP, FAAN, is Professor of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia.
Affan Ghaffari
Jianfang Liu
Matthew D McHugh
Ural State Medical University · RUFord Foundation · US

Funding

Further Psychometric Testing and Validation of the Errors of Care Omission Survey (EoCOS)R03HS024758 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI POGHOSYAN, LUSINE · 2016 to 2017
$100k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS024758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of organizational support in healthcare settings has been linked to high levels of clinician stress, burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Little research exists on organizational support for nurse practitioners.

objectiveWe investigated the relationship between organizational support and nurse practitioner outcomes, including job satisfaction, intent to leave, and quality of care.

methodsA cross-sectional survey design was used to collect survey data from nurse practitioners (n = 398) in primary care practices in New York State in 2017. Nurse practitioners completed mail surveys with validated measures of organizational support, job satisfaction, intent to leave, and quality of care. Information on participant demographics and work characteristics was also collected. Multilevel regression models assessed the relationship between organizational-level organizational support and resources measure and job satisfaction, intent to leave, and quality of care.

resultsThe organizational-level organizational support and resources measure had a mean of 3.31 on a 4-point scale. Twenty-five percent of the participants were either moderately dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their jobs, and about 11% intended to leave their current jobs within 1 year. The average quality of care rated by participants was 8.51 out of 10-10 being the best quality of care. After adjusting for covariates, higher organizational-level organizational support and resources measure score was associated with higher job satisfaction category, lower odds of intent to leave, and higher quality of care. DISCUSSION: Nurse practitioners from primary care practices with higher levels of organizational support are more likely to be satisfied with their jobs, have less intent to leave their jobs, and report better quality of care. Thus, in order to promote nurse practitioner job satisfaction, retain them in clinical positions, and improve quality of care, administrators should take actions to promote organizational support for them. Our findings are consistent with existing literature regarding the relationship between organizational support and clinician outcomes.

Indexed as

Health WorkforceJob SatisfactionOrganizational CultureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkNurse PractitionersPersonnel TurnoverPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32058457
PMCPMC9869754
OpenAlexW3006442948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.