Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32058248›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Legal requirements and recommendations to prescribe naloxone.

Rebecca L Haffajee, Samantha Cherney, Rosanna Smart

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Report of the 2020 Special Committee on Substance Use and Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca L HaffajeeRAND Corporation, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Injury Prevention Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: haffajee@rand.org.
Samantha CherneyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States. Electronic address: scherney@rand.org.
Rosanna SmartRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States. Electronic address: rsmart@rand.org.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Optimal Methods for Estimating Policy Effect Heterogeneity in Opioid Policy ResearchP50DA046351 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI BRADLEY D STEIN · 2018 to 2026
$20.8M
State Naloxone Policies: Exploring Effects of Implementation on EMS and Community Bystander UseR21DA045950 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI SMART, ROSANNA · 2018 to 2019
$474k
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA046351NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA045950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe continued toll of opioid-related overdoses has motivated efforts to expand availability of naloxone to persons at high risk of overdose, with 2016 federal guidance encouraging clinicians to co-prescribe naloxone to patients with increased overdose risk. Some states have pursued analogous or stricter legal requirements that could more heavily influence prescriber behavior.

methodsWe conducted a systematic legal review of state laws that mandate or recommend that healthcare providers prescribe naloxone to patients with indicators for opioid overdose risk. We coded relevant statutes and regulations for: applicable populations, patient criteria, educational requirements, and exemptions.

resultsAs of September 2019, 17 states had enacted naloxone co-prescribing laws, the earliest of which was implemented by Louisiana in January 2016. If patient overdose risk criteria are met, over half of these states mandate that providers prescribe naloxone (7 states, 41.1 %) or offer a naloxone prescription (2 states, 11.8 %); the remainder encourage prescribers to consider prescribing naloxone (8 states). Most states (58.8 %) define patient overdose risk based on opioid dosages prescribed, although the threshold varies substantially; other common overdose risk criteria include concomitant opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions and patient history of substance use disorder or mental illness.

conclusionsA growing minority of states has adopted a naloxone prescribing law, although these policies remain less prevalent than other naloxone access laws. By targeting higher-risk patients during clinical encounters, naloxone prescribing requirements could increase naloxone prescribed, destigmatize naloxone use, and reduce overdose harms. Further investigation into policy effectiveness, unintended consequences, and appropriate parameters is warranted.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDatabases, FactualDrug OverdoseDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansLegislation, DrugMaleNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsCo-prescriptionHarm reductionNaloxoneOpioid policyOverdose

Identifiers

PMID32058248
PMCPMC7127952
OpenAlexW3004822375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.