Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32057994›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Impact of Sequencing Radiation Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastases.

Daniel A Pomeranz Krummel, Tahseen H Nasti, Benjamin Izar, Robert H Press, Maxwell Xu, Lindsey Lowder, Laura Kallay, Manali Rupji, Havi Rosen, Jing Su and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Emerging Studies of Melanoma Brain Metastasis.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Daniel A Pomeranz KrummelDepartment of Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Tahseen H NastiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Benjamin IzarColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York.
Robert H PressDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Maxwell XuDepartment of Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Lindsey LowderDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Laura KallayDepartment of Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Manali RupjiWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Havi RosenDepartment of Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Jing SuDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Walter CurranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jeffrey OlsonWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Brent WeinbergDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Matthew SchniederjanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Stewart NeillDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
David LawsonWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jeanne KowalskiDepartment of Oncology, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
Mohammad K KhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: drkhurram2000@gmail.com.
Soma SenguptaDepartment of Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: soma.sengupta@uc.edu.

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
Systems Pharmacology of Therapeutic and Adverse Responses to ImmuneCheckpoint and Small Molecule DrugsU54CA225088 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2018 to 2022
$10.8M
Dissecting mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance in melanoma patientsK08CA222663 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI IZAR, BENJAMIN · 2017 to 2021
$827k
Elucidating Signaling Pathways for GABA-A Receptor Alpha5 in an Aggressive Subtype of MedulloblastomasK08NS083626 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SENGUPTA, SOMA · 2014 to 2018
$741k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA222663NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS U54 CA225088NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS083626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMelanoma brain metastases (MBM) occur in ∼50% of melanoma patients. Although both radiation therapy (RT) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) are used alone or in combination for MBM treatment, the role of this combination and how these treatments could best be sequenced remains unclear. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with resected MBM who underwent treatment with RT, ICI, or a combination of RT and ICI. Among the latter, we specifically investigated the differential gene expression via RNA-sequencing between patients who received RT first then ICI (RT → ICI) versus ICI first then RT (ICI → RT). We used a glycoprotein-transduced syngeneic melanoma mouse model for validation experiments.

resultsWe found that for patients with resected MBM, a combination of RT and ICI confers superior survival compared with RT alone. Specifically, we found that RT → ICI was superior compared with ICI → RT. Transcriptome analysis of resected MBM revealed that the RT → ICI cohort demonstrated deregulation of genes involved in apoptotic signaling and key modulators of inflammation that are most implicated in nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells signaling. In a preclinical model, we showed that RT followed by anti-programmed death-ligand 1 therapy was superior to the reverse sequence of therapy, supporting the observations we made in patients with MBM.

conclusionsOur study provides initial insights into the optimal sequence of RT and ICI in the treatment of MBM after surgical resection. Prospective studies examining the best sequence of RT and ICI are necessary, and our study contributes to the rationale to pursue these.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaMiceRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTranscriptomeImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32057994
PMCPMC7839060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.