ArticleDiabetes research and clinical practice2020
Factors associated with health psychology use in pediatric type 1 diabetes.
Article in Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Explain the behavior change and maintenance in diabetic patients using MTM-HAPA framework.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsIdentify the prevalence of health psychology use in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and evaluate how individual and contextual characteristics are associated with use.
methodsChildren ages 8-16 years with T1D and their parents were recruited from two tertiary diabetes clinics. Cross-sectional data included parent and adolescent surveys and hemoglobin A1c. Parents self-reported the child's use of health psychology in the last year along with individual factors (e.g., predisposing factors including demographics, enabling factors including health insurance type, evaluated need including mental health diagnoses and perceived need including self-management barriers). Association of health psychology use with individual (e.g., demographics, enabling factors, evaluated and perceived need) and contextual (e.g., clinical site) characteristics was evaluated using logistic regression.
resultsOf 363 eligible participants, 267 (74%) participated. Health psychology use was reported by only 8.2% (n = 22) of participants and was significantly associated with evaluated need factor of mental health diagnosis (OR 5.8; p < 0.001) and perceived need factor of parent-reported self-management barriers. Use was not associated with other individual or contextual factors.
conclusionsThough infrequent, health psychology use was positively associated with mental health diagnoses and self-management barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.