ReviewBio Systems2020
Multi-parameter exploration of dynamics of regulatory networks.
Review in Bio Systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Petri net on expanded networks computes the dynamics of finite multilevel models.Interface focus · 2025Article
- Multistability and predominant hybrid phenotypes in a four node mutually repressive network of Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg differentiation.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Network topology and interaction logic determine states it supports.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Oscillator death in coupled biochemical oscillators.Mathematics of control, signals, and systems : MCSS · 2023Article
- Assessing biological network dynamics: comparing numerical simulations with analytical decomposition of parameter space.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- Mathematical modeling of regulatory networks of intracellular processes - Aims and selected methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Joint Realizability of Monotone Boolean Functions.Theoretical computer science · 2022Article
- Application of Sensitivity Analysis to Discover Potential Molecular Drug Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Rational design of complex phenotype via network models.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Over the last twenty years advances in systems biology have changed our views on microbial communities and promise to revolutionize treatment of human diseases. In almost all scientific breakthroughs since time of Newton, mathematical modeling has played a prominent role. Regulatory networks emerged as preferred descriptors of how abundances of molecular species depend on each other. However, the central question on how cellular phenotypes emerge from dynamics of these network remains elusive. The principal reason is that differential equation models in the field of biology (while so successful in areas of physics and physical chemistry), do not arise from first principles, and these models suffer from lack of proper parameterization. In response to these challenges, discrete time models based on Boolean networks have been developed. In this review, we discuss an emerging modeling paradigm that combines ideas from differential equations and Boolean models, and has been developed independently within dynamical systems and computer science communities. The result is an approach that can associate a range of potential dynamical behaviors to a network, arrange the descriptors of the dynamics in a searchable database, and allows for multi-parameter exploration of the dynamics akin to bifurcation theory. Since this approach is computationally accessible for moderately sized networks, it allows, perhaps for the first time, to rationally compare different network topologies based on their dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.