ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020
Imaging of Muller cell sheen dystrophy.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging the eye as a window to brain health: frontier approaches and future directions.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Review
- Novel pathogenic variants in Tubulin Tyrosine Like 5 (Molecular vision · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To report a rare case of Muller cell sheen dystrophy and to describe its clinical and diagnostic aspects. A 42-year-old woman presented with unilateral defective vision. Fundus evaluation revealed bilateral glistening retinal reflexes throughout the posterior pole with a wrinkled appearance in the right. Spectral Domain-OCT in the right showed abnormal internal limiting membrane, intraretinal schisis with serous detachment at macula. Angiography revealed staining along vessels. Electroretinogram in the affected eye was negative. At 4 months of follow up, vision dropped and intraretinal schisis increased. Family screening was negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.