Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32056935›Full record

SynthesisJournal of affective disorders2020

Development of the Ketamine Side Effect Tool (KSET).

Brooke Short, Vanessa Dong, Verònica Gálvez, Vedran Vulovic, Donel Martin, Adam J Bayes, Carlos A Zarate, James W Murrough, Declan M McLoughlin, Patricio Riva-Posse and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of affective disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ketamine treatment for depression: a review.Discover mental health · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Brooke ShortSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia.
Vanessa DongSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Verònica GálvezCorporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, I3PT, Institut d'Investigacio i Innovacio Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Vedran VulovicUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Donel MartinSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Adam J BayesSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Carlos A ZarateDivision of Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, MD, United States.
James W MurroughDepression and Anxiety Centre for Discovery and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Declan M McLoughlinDepartment of Psychiatry, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Patricio Riva-PosseDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Robert SchoeversThe University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands.
Renerio FraguasDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo (USP), School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry and Psychology, University Hospital (HU), USP Laboratório de Investigação Médica, Recife, Brazil.
Paul GlueSouthern DHB and Hazel Buckland Chair in Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Johnson FamDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Rupert McShaneDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Colleen K LooSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia; Wesley Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: colleen.loo@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUBlack Dog Institute · AUCenter for Discovery · USEmory University · USGosford Hospital · AUHospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo · BRNational Institute of Mental Health · USNational University Hospital · SGTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Glutamatergic Modulators for Rapid & Sustained Antidepressant EffectZIAMH002857 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2009 to 2025
$55.0M
Target validation of novel therapeutic agents in mood disordersZIAMH002927 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2010 to 2025
$37.1M
Department of HealthIntramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, no specific, systematic assessment tool for the monitoring and reporting of ketamine-related side effects exists. Our aim was to develop a comprehensive Ketamine Side Effect Tool (KSET) to capture acute and longer-term side effects associated with repeated ketamine treatments.

methodsInformed by systematic review data and clinical research, we drafted a list of the most commonly reported side effects. Face and content validation were obtained via feedback from collaborators with expertise in psychiatry and anaesthetics, clinical trial piloting and a modified Delphi Technique involving ten international experts.

resultsThe final version consisted of four forms that collect information at time points: screening, baseline, immediately after a single treatment, and longer-term follow-up. Instructions were developed to guide users and promote consistent utilisation. LIMITATIONS: Further evaluation of feasibility, construct validity and reliability is required, and is planned across multiple international sites.

conclusionsThe structured Ketamine Side Effect Tool (KSET) was developed, with confirmation of content and face validity via a Delphi consensus process. This tool is timely, given the paucity of data regarding ketamine's safety, tolerability and abuse potential over the longer term, and its recent adoption internationally as a clinical treatment for depression. Although based on data from depression studies, the KSET has potential applicability for ketamine (or derivatives) used in other medical disorders, including chronic pain. We recommend its utilisation for both research and clinical scenarios, including data registries.

Indexed as

Chronic PainDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsKetamineHumansReproducibility of ResultsKetamineDepressionKetamineKetamine Side Effect Tool (KSET)SafetySide effects

Identifiers

PMID32056935
PMCPMC7693479
OpenAlexW3002849765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.