Observational studyInternational wound journal2020
Exploring the prevalence and management of wounds for people with dementia in long-term care.
Observational study in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Deterioration in Long-Term Care: A Delphi Study of Indicators, Care Pathways and Implementation Strategies.International journal of nursing practice · 2026Article
- Improving Wound Care in Residential Aged Care Facilities: Development, Validation and Use of a Novel Knowledge Translation Framework.International journal of older people nursing · 2025Article
- Digitising wound care: a cost-consequence analysis of the Wound Care Command Centre™ in Australia.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Dementia severity and advanced pressure injury procedures and prognosis: A nationwide study in Japan.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2024Article
- The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Survival analysis of older adults with dementia: predicting factors after unplanned hospitalization in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Chronic wounds in persons living with dementia: An integrative review.International journal of older people nursing · 2022Review
- Exploring the prevalence and management of wounds for people with dementia in long-term care.International wound journal · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of wounds and comorbidities such as dementia increase with age. With an ageing population, the likelihood of overlap of these conditions is strong. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of wound types and current management strategies of wound care for people with dementia in long-term care (LTC). A scoping literature review, a cross-sectional observational and chart audit study of residents in dementia specific facilities in LTC were conducted. The scoping review indicated that people with dementia/cognitive impairment are often excluded from wound related studies andof the nine studies included in this review, none looked at the prevalence of types of wounds other then pressure injuries. In the skin audit, skin tears were noted as the most common wound type with some evidence-based practice strategies in place for residents. However, documentation of current wound occurred in less than a third of residents with wounds. This is the first study to note the prevalence of different wound types in people with dementia and current management strategies being used across two dementia-specific facilities and a lack of research in this area limits evidence in guiding practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.