Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32056250›Full record

ReviewAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2020

To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research.

Melissa A Cyders, Martin H Plawecki, William Corbin, Andrea King, Denis M McCarthy, Vijay A Ramchandani, Jessica Weafer, Sean J O'Connor

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aversion-resistant alcohol seeking in the human laboratory.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Analgesic effects of alcohol in adults with chronic jaw pain.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex-Based Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Alcohol-Seeking.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. High-intensity sweet taste as a predictor of subjective alcohol responses to the ascending limb of an intravenous alcohol prime: an fMRI study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Haven't lost the positive feeling: a dose-response, oral alcohol challenge study in drinkers with alcohol use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A CydersDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University - Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1990-8337
Martin H PlaweckiDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0708-9514
William CorbinDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8665-7473
Andrea KingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Denis M McCarthyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Universtiy of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Vijay A RamchandaniSection on Human Psychopharmacology, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Jessica WeaferDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States.
Sean J O'ConnorDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-243X
Indiana University School of MedicineArizona State University · USNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Indianapolis · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Nicholas Joseph Grahame · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
Alcohol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in HumansZIAAA000466 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI RAMCHANDANI, VIJAY ARJUN · 2009 to 2025
$31.2M
Alcohol Stimulation and Sedation in Binge Drinkers - Renewal 01R01AA013746 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DANIEL J FRIDBERG, ANDREA C KING · 2003 to 2026
$11.6M
Risk for Alcohol Impaired Driving: From the Laboratory to the Natural EnvironmentR01AA019546 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MCCARTHY, DENIS M · 2010 to 2021
$4.3M
Sex Differences in the Response to Abstinence from Alcohol.R01AA027236 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CYDERS, MELISSA A, PLAWECKI, MARTIN H. · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Neurobiological factors underlying sex differences in risk for alcohol abuseK01AA024519 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WEAFER, JESSICA J · 2016 to 2020
$598k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA024519NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013746NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA019546NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human alcohol laboratory studies use two routes of alcohol administration: ingestion and infusion. The goal of this paper was to compare and contrast these alcohol administration methods. The work summarized in this report was the basis of a 2019 Research Society on Alcoholism Roundtable, "To Ingest or Infuse: A Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Alcohol Administration Methods for Human Alcohol Laboratory Designs." We review the methodological approaches of each and highlight strengths and weaknesses pertaining to different research questions. We summarize methodological considerations to aid researchers in choosing the most appropriate method for their inquiry, considering exposure variability, alcohol expectancy effects, safety, bandwidth, technical skills, documentation of alcohol exposure, experimental variety, ecological validity, and cost. Ingestion of alcohol remains a common and often a preferable, methodological practice in alcohol research. Nonetheless, the main problem with ingestion is that even the most careful calculation of dose and control of dosing procedures yields substantial and uncontrollable variability in the participants' brain exposures to alcohol. Infusion methodologies provide precise exposure control but are technically complex and may be limited in ecological validity. We suggest that alcohol ingestion research may not be the same thing as alcohol exposure research; investigators should be aware of the advantages and disadvantages that the choice between ingestion and infusion of alcohol invokes.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdministration, OralAlcoholic BeveragesBlood Alcohol ContentCentral Nervous System DepressantsEatingEthanolHumansInfusions, IntravenousSelf AdministrationBlood Alcohol ContentCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolAlcohol ExperimentsHuman Laboratory ResearchIntravenous Alcohol InfusionOral Alcohol Ingestion

Identifiers

PMID32056250
PMCPMC7166191
OpenAlexW3005912000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.