ArticleRadiological physics and technology2020
Evaluation of computed tomography arterial portography scan timing using different bolus tracking methods.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography arterial portography (CTAP) is widely used with a fixed scan timing and contrast medium quantity; however, these parameters are not necessarily optimal. In this study, CTAP scan timing was analyzed by different bolus tracking methods to monitor the inflow of the contrast medium in real-time. A total of 249 patients who underwent CTAP were assessed. In 30 patients, the CTAP scanning began 33 s after contrast medium injection started (fixed method). In 74 patients, the regions of interest (ROIs) were established at two places in the inferior vena cava above the hepatic vein (inferior vena cava-ROI method). In 145 patients, the ROI was established at two places in the liver parenchyma (liver parenchyma-ROI method). Scan timing was considered appropriate when the difference in the CT value between the hepatic and portal veins approached 0; this was observed significantly more with the liver parenchyma-ROI method than with the other methods. CTAP scan timing with the liver parenchyma-ROI method was better than that with the fixed and inferior vena cava-ROI methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.