ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2020
Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty as a Treatment in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Past, Present, and Future.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Pulmonary Artery Flow Reserve in Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Pilot Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Effectiveness and Safety of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for the Treatment of Patients with Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension after Pulmonary Endarterectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Right ventricular end-systolic remodeling index on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with other functional markers in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Epidemiology and Management of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in Greece. Real-World Data from the Hellenic Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (HOPE).Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a major cause of precapillary pulmonary hypertension leading to right heart failure and death if left untreated. In addition to pulmonary endarterectomy, which is considered the standard of care, and specific drug therapy that is not however expected to offer relief from the mechanical component of the disease, the therapeutic options for CTEPH have expanded with the development of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). The purpose of this review is a better understanding and evaluation of BPA as a treatment option in CTEPH patients. RECENT
findingsWith the evolution of BPA almost all over the world, more centers outside Japan, which remains the leader for the technique, presented their results confirming the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of this procedure as a complementary strategy in the treatment algorithm of CTEPH. Summarizing, more data from all over the world confirm that BPA is a challenging but potentially effective intervention for the treatment of inoperable CTEPH patients. However, there is a need for standardization of the technique, and furthermore, large, international, multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing BPA with the other treatment modalities of CTEPH are imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.