Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32056024›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2020

Current trends in canine dirofilariosis in Austria-do we face a pre-endemic status?

Karin Sonnberger, Georg G Duscher, Hans-Peter Fuehrer, Michael Leschnik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Change in the Distribution Pattern ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
  12. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. First Autochthonous Infection of a Cat withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Incidence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin SonnbergerTierklinik Sattledt Traunkeis Vet Clinic OG, Kirchdorfer Staße 7, 4642, Sattledt, Austria.
Georg G DuscherInstitute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Hans-Peter FuehrerInstitute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Michael LeschnikInternal Medicine Small Animals Department for Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria. Michael.Leschnik@vetmeduni.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6312-8579
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A retrospective study based on cases of canine dirofilariosis presented to the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna or diagnosed by private practitioners throughout Austria, from 1998 to 2018 was conducted to investigate the long-term development and current state of canine dirofilarial infections in Austria. Included in this study were 146 dogs which were tested positive for D. immitis and/or D. repens. The most commonly used diagnostic methods and the probable geographical origins of the infections were evaluated and the treatment protocols applied were compared with each other and with the literature. The results show that most infections were found due to screening for common travel infections using antigen-ELISA or PCR-testing, or by the incidental finding of microfilariae. Remarkably, only 24.3% of all cases presented showed clinical signs indicating canine dirofilariosis. Regarding the origin and travel history of the dogs, thirteen different countries could be identified. The three treatment protocols used showed a similar outcome after 8 months of treatment and minor side effects, which is consistent with the literature. An alarming increase in reported infections with both D. immitis and D. repens in Austria was noted since 2014. The number of documented cases had almost tripled by 2018, raising severe concerns about the threat of it becoming endemic in Austria. Therefore, the existing recommendations in current guidelines regarding canine dirofilariosis should be widely publicised and more strictly enforced. Prophylactic measures for dogs travelling abroad and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for dogs imported from endemic countries should be obligatorily established throughout Europe, to reduce the risk of further spread of canine filarial infections to non-endemic regions.

Indexed as

AnimalsAustriaDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleMaleMicrofilariaePolymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesTravelCanine dirofilariosisDirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID32056024
PMCPMC7075843
OpenAlexW3006246147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.