Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32056021›Full record

ReviewOecologia2020

Gridlock and beltways: the genetic context of urban invasions.

E M X Reed, M E Serr, A S Maurer, M O Burford Reiskind

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E M X ReedDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. emreed@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-8941
M E SerrDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
A S MaurerDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
M O Burford ReiskindDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-9215
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of urban land across the globe presents new and numerous opportunities for invasive species to spread and flourish. Ecologists historically rejected urban ecosystems as important environments for ecology and evolution research but are beginning to recognize the importance of these systems in shaping the biology of invasion. Urbanization can aid the introduction, establishment, and spread of invaders, and these processes have substantial consequences on native species and ecosystems. Therefore, it is valuable to understand how urban areas influence populations at all stages in the invasion process. Population genetic tools are essential to explore the driving forces of invasive species dispersal, connectivity, and adaptation within cities. In this review, we synthesize current research about the influence of urban landscapes on invasion genetics dynamics. We conclude that urban areas are not only points of entry for many invasive species, they also facilitate population establishment, are pools for genetic diversity, and provide corridors for further spread both within and out of cities. We recommend the continued use of genetic studies to inform invasive species management and to understand the underlying ecological and evolutionary processes governing successful invasion.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemCitiesEcologyGenetic VariationIntroduced SpeciesInvasive speciesLandscape geneticsPopulation geneticsSynthesisUrban ecosystems

Identifiers

PMID32056021
OpenAlexW3005919781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.