Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055916›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2020

Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in children: review with procedural recommendations and clinical applications from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology abdominal imaging task force.

Damjana Ključevšek, Michael Riccabona, Lil-Sofie Ording Müller, Magdalena Maria Woźniak, Stéphanie Franchi-Abella, Kassa Darge, Hans-Joachim Mentzel, Aikaterini Ntoulia, Fred Efraim Avni, Marcello Napolitano and 8 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

Damjana KljučevšekDepartment of Radiology, University Children's Hospital,, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. damjana.kljucevsek@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-2943
Michael RiccabonaDepartment of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital LKH Graz and Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Lil-Sofie Ording MüllerDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Paediatric Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Magdalena Maria WoźniakDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Stéphanie Franchi-AbellaService de Radiopédiatrie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hans-Joachim MentzelSection of Pediatric Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Aikaterini NtouliaDepartment of Radiology, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Fred Efraim AvniDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital,, Lille University Hospitals, Lille, France.
Marcello NapolitanoDepartment of Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology,, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Luisa LoboDepartment of Radiology, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, University Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
Annemieke Simone LittooijPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology,, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Utrecht/UMCU, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Thomas Angell AugdalDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Costanza BrunoRadiology Institute, Department of Radiology, AOUI, Verona, Italy.
Beatrice Maria DamasioDepartment of Radiology, Instituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Donald IbeRadiology Department, Silhouette Diagnostic Consultants,, Wuse 2, Abuja, Nigeria.
Samuel StafraceDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Philippe PetitService d'Imagerie Pédiatrique et Prénatale, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Marseille, France.
Bicêtre Hospital · FRChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRHospital de Santa Maria · PTIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITJena University Hospital · DELjubljana University Medical Centre · SIMedical University of Lublin · PLOslo University Hospital · NOOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITPoole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBPrincess Máxima Center · NLUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) has become an important supplementary tool in many clinical applications in children. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography and intravenous US contrast agents have proved useful in routine clinical practice. Other applications of intracavitary contrast-enhanced US, particularly in children, have not been widely investigated but could serve as a practical and radiation-free problem-solver in several clinical settings. Intracavitary contrast-enhanced US is a real-time imaging modality similar to fluoroscopy with iodinated contrast agent. The US contrast agent solution is administered into physiological or non-physiological body cavities. There is no definitive list of established indications for intracavitary US contrast agent application. However, intracavitary contrast-enhanced US can be used for many clinical applications. It offers excellent real-time spatial resolution and allows for a more accurate delineation of the cavity anatomy, including the internal architecture of complex collections and possible communications within the cavity or with the surrounding structures through fistulous tracts. It can provide valuable information related to the insertion of catheters and tubes, and identify related complications such as confirming the position and patency of a catheter and identifying causes for drainage dysfunction or leakage. Patency of the ureter and biliary ducts can be evaluated, too. US contrast agent solution can be administered orally or a via nasogastric tube, or as an enema to evaluate the gastrointestinal tract. In this review we present potential clinical applications and procedural and dose recommendations regarding intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAbdominal CavityAdolescentBiliary Tract DiseasesChildChild, PreschoolEuropeFemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansImage EnhancementInfantMaleMale Urogenital DiseasesPediatricsContrast MediaChildrenContrast agentsContrast-enhancedIntracavitaryUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32055916
OpenAlexW3006490371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.