Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055885›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2020

[Airway management in preclinical emergency anesthesia with respect to specialty and education].

A Luckscheiter, T Lohs, M Fischer, W Zink

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A LuckscheiterKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland. luckscha@klilu.de.
T LohsStelle zur trägerübergreifenden Qualitätssicherung im Rettungsdienst Baden-Württemberg (SQR-BW), Stuttgart, Deutschland.
M FischerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Alb Fils Kliniken, Göppingen, Deutschland.
W ZinkKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEAlb Fils Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDifficult airway management is a key skill in preclinical emergency medicine. A lower rate of subjective difficult airways and an increased success rate of endotracheal intubation have been reported for highly trained emergency physicians. The aim of this study was therefore to analyze the effect for different specialists and the individual state of training in the German emergency medical system. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a retrospective register analysis of 6024 preclinical anesthesia procedures, the frequencies of airway devices, neuromuscular blocking agents, capnography and difficult airways were analyzed with respect to specialization and status of training. Additionally, low, medium and highly experienced emergency physicians in airway management were summarized by specialization and status of training according to the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition and compared.

resultsThe incidence of subjective difficult airway situations was 10% for anesthesiological emergency physicians compared to 15-20% for other disciplines. The latter used supraglottic airway devices more often (7-9% vs. 4%) and video laryngoscopes less often (3% vs. 5%) compared to anesthesiological emergency physicians. The discipline-related state of training was inhomogeneous and revealed a reduced rate of supraglottic airway devices for internal specialists with further training (10% vs. 2%). Anesthetists specialized in intensive care medicine used capnography less frequently compared to other anesthetists (79% vs. 72%). With higher levels of experience in airway management, the frequency of endotracheal intubation (86% vs. 94%), neuromuscular blocking agents (59% vs. 73%) and video laryngoscopy (3% vs. 6%) increased and the incidence of subjective difficult airway situations (16% vs. 10%) decreased.

conclusionThe level of training in airway management especially for non-anesthetists is inhomogeneous. The recently published German S1 guidelines for prehospital airway management recommend education and training as well as the primary use of the video laryngoscope with Macintosh blade. The implementation could lower the incidence of subjective difficult airways.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementAnesthesiaClinical CompetenceEmergency Medical TechniciansEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalGermanyHumansIntubation, IntratrachealRetrospective StudiesAirway managementAnestheticsCapnographyEmergency medicineEndotracheal intubationLaryngoscope

Identifiers

PMID32055885
OpenAlexW3005710692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.