Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055879›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

No clinical differences at the 2-year follow-up between single radius and J-curve medial pivot total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of neutral or varus knees.

Pier Francesco Indelli, Federica Morello, Stefano Ghirardelli, Andrea Fidanza, Ferdinando Iannotti, Augusto Ferrini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Effect of the Design of Polyethylene Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Patient Reported Outcomes.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Pier Francesco IndelliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. pindelli@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-8027
Federica MorelloDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Stefano GhirardelliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Andrea FidanzaDepartment of Life Health and Environmental Sciences, Unit of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Ferdinando IannottiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Augusto FerriniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeModern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems are designed to reproduce the normal knee kinematics and improve patient outcome. The authors compared two different third-generation medial pivot TKA implants, having a single-radius or a J-curve design in their sagittal plane, hypothesizing no clinical differences.

methodsTwo cohorts of 50 patients who underwent primary TKA were first preoperatively matched by sex, deformity, body mass index (BMI), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee society score (KSS) and range of motion (ROM) and then statistically analyzed at a minimum follow-up (FU) of 2 years. An identical surgical technique, which aimed to reproduce a slightly tighter medial than lateral compartment, was used in all knees.

resultsAt a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range 24-34 months) there were no statistically significant differences in OKS and KSS between the two implant groups. The final ROM differed statistically between the two groups: the average maximum active flexion was 123° in the J-curve femoral design group with an adapted "medially-congruent" polyethylene insert, and 116° in the single radius femoral design with a medial "ball-in-socket" articulation.

conclusionNo clinical and radiological differences were found when the two cohorts of patients were compared. This study showed that the implant design played a minor role in the final outcome as opposed to a precise surgical technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case-control study, Level III.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPolyethyleneRadiographyPolyethyleneCruciate-retainingKinematicsKneeMedial pivotTKATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32055879
OpenAlexW3005639980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.