Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055750›Full record

ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2020

Advances in urinary biomarker discovery in urological research.

Jayoung Kim, Won Tae Kim, Wun-Jae Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Liquid Biopsy for Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.International neurourology journal · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Your first-choice journal in urology.Investigative and clinical urology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mutational analysis ofWorld journal of clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Celebrating the 60th anniversary ofInvestigative and clinical urology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jayoung KimDepartments of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3683-4627
Won Tae KimDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7482-4550
Wun-Jae KimDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8060-8926
Chungbuk National University · KRCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

The Epidemiology of Interstitial Cystitis in a Nationwide Multiethnic VA CohortU01DP006079 · DP · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANGER, JENNIFER TASH, FREEDLAND, STEPHEN JAY · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Microbiome and Proteome As Predictive Biomarkers of UCPPSU01DK103260 · NIDDK · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANGER, JENNIFER TASH, FREEMAN, MICHAEL R · 2014 to 2018
$1.2M
ACL HHS U01DP006079NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006079NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK103260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A disease-specific biomarker (or biomarkers) is a characteristic reflecting a pathological condition in human body, which can be used as a diagnostic or prognostic tool for the clinical management. A urine-based biomarker(s) may provide a clinical value as attractive tools for clinicians to utilize in the clinical setting in particular to bladder diseases including bladder cancer and other bladder benign dysfunctions. Urine can be easily obtained by patients with no preparation or painful procedures required from patients' side. Currently advanced omics technologies and computational power identified potential omics-based novel biomarkers. An unbiased profiling based on transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, metabolomics approaches et al. found that expression at RNA, protein, and metabolite levels are linked with specific bladder diseases and outcomes. In this review, we will discuss about the urine-based biomarkers reported by many investigators including us and how these biomarkers can be applied as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical trials and patient care to promote bladder health. Furthermore, we will discuss how these promising biomarkers can be developed into a smart medical device and what we should be cautious about toward being used in real clinical setting.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchUrologyBiomarkersHumansUrinary Bladder DiseasesBiomarkersBiomarkersCystitis, interstitialUrinary bladderUrinary bladder neoplasmsUrine

Identifiers

PMID32055750
PMCPMC7004831
OpenAlexW2990918818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.