ArticleHuman reproduction open2020
Growth and other health outcomes of 2-year-old singletons born after IVM versus controlled ovarian stimulation in mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vitro maturation 2.0: a new era for an underdog in ART.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes of natural cycle IVF/M with the different sizes of dominant follicle at the time of hCG triggering.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- The Late Effects of Cancer Treatment on Female Fertility and the Current Status of Fertility Preservation-A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Improvement and Clinical Application of Human Oocyte In Vitro Maturation (IVM).Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2022Review
- In vitro maturation without gonadotropins versus in vitro fertilization with hyperstimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- RescueFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Article
- Factors Influencing the In Vitro Maturation (IVM) of Human Oocyte.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- The live birth in a woman with resistant ovary syndrome after in vitro oocyte maturation and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionDoes SUMMARY ANSWER: This study of 92 singletons born after IVM in mothers with PCOS showed no significant differences in anthropometry and health outcome parameters in comparison with a cohort of 74 peers born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in mothers with PCOS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: IVM has been used worldwide in women with PCOS. However, the paucity of available data related to children's health following IVM is an important impediment to a more widespread use of the technology. Although previous reports on the neonatal outcome after IVM are generally reassuring, these studies have flaws that hamper the interpretation of outcomes. Moreover, few studies have reported on health outcomes after IVM beyond infancy, and particularly growth data in children born after IVM of immature oocytes from mothers with PCOS are lacking. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This single-center cohort study compared anthropometry and health outcomes in 92 singletons born after ICSI of PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsAnthropometric parameters and health status data were prospectively collected at birth, 4 months and 2 years in cohorts of singletons followed since birth. Results were adjusted for neonatal (birthweight MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, no differences were found for bodyweight, height and head circumference LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although our study describes the largest cohort to date of singletons born after IVM applied in mothers with well-defined PCOS phenotypes, the current sample size only allowed us to detect moderate differences in anthropometry. Also, follow-up of children born after IVM for indications other than PCOS, for example fertililty preservation after cancer diagnosis, is highly recommended. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsWe did not observe adverse effects of IVM on growth parameters in offspring ~2 years of age compared to COS, but future studies should focus on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes in these children and adolescents given their mother's PCOS condition. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by Methusalem grants and by grants from Wetenschappelijk Fonds Willy Gepts; all issued by the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). All co-authors, except M.B., M.D.V. and H.T. declared no conflict of interest. M.B. has received consultancy fees from MSD, Serono Symposia and Merck. M.D.V. has received fees for lectures from MSD, Ferring, Gedeon Richter and Cook Medical. H.T. has received consultancy fees from Gedeon Richter, Merck, Ferring, Abbott and ObsEva. The Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel) and the Center for Medical Genetics have received several educational grants from IBSA, Ferring, MSD and Merck for establishing the database for follow-up research and organizing the data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.