Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055649›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on computational imaging2020

Super-Resolution PET Imaging Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Tzu-An Song, Samadrita Roy Chowdhury, Fan Yang, Joyita Dutta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on computational imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tzu-An SongDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854 USA and co-affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114.
Samadrita Roy ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854 USA and co-affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114.
Fan YangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854 USA and co-affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114.
Joyita DuttaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854 USA and co-affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114.
University of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

Tau Quantitation in AD with High Resolution MRI and PETK01AG050711 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DUTTA, JOYITA · 2015 to 2019
$650k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG050711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) suffers from severe resolution limitations which reduce its quantitative accuracy. In this paper, we present a super-resolution (SR) imaging technique for PET based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). To facilitate the resolution recovery process, we incorporate high-resolution (HR) anatomical information based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. We introduce the spatial location information of the input image patches as additional CNN inputs to accommodate the spatially-variant nature of the blur kernels in PET. We compared the performance of shallow (3-layer) and very deep (20-layer) CNNs with various combinations of the following inputs: low-resolution (LR) PET, radial locations, axial locations, and HR MR. To validate the CNN architectures, we performed both realistic simulation studies using the BrainWeb digital phantom and clinical studies using neuroimaging datasets. For both simulation and clinical studies, the LR PET images were based on the Siemens HR+ scanner. Two different scenarios were examined in simulation: one where the target HR image is the ground-truth phantom image and another where the target HR image is based on the Siemens HRRT scanner - a high-resolution dedicated brain PET scanner. The latter scenario was also examined using clinical neuroimaging datasets. A number of factors affected relative performance of the different CNN designs examined, including network depth, target image quality, and the resemblance between the target and anatomical images. In general, however, all deep CNNs outperformed classical penalized deconvolution and partial volume correction techniques by large margins both qualitatively (e.g., edge and contrast recovery) and quantitatively (as indicated by three metrics: peak signal-to-noise-ratio, structural similarity index, and contrast-to-noise ratio).

Indexed as

CNNdeep learningmultimodality imagingpartial volume correctionPET/MRIsuper-resolution

Identifiers

PMID32055649
PMCPMC7017584
OpenAlexW2948025379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.