Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055648›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2020

VEGFD Protects Retinal Ganglion Cells and, consequently, Capillaries against Excitotoxic Injury.

Annabelle Schlüter, Bahar Aksan, Ricarda Diem, Richard Fairless, Daniela Mauceri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Visual Dysfunction in Diabetes.Annual review of vision science · 2023
    Review
  8. Novel therapeutic approaches to target neurodegeneration.British journal of pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annabelle SchlüterDepartment of Neurobiology, Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Bahar AksanDepartment of Neurobiology, Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ricarda DiemDepartment of Neurology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 368, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Richard FairlessDepartment of Neurology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 368, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniela MauceriDepartment of Neurobiology, Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the central nervous system, neurons and the vasculature influence each other. While it is well described that a functional vascular system is trophic to neurons and that vascular damage contributes to neurodegeneration, the opposite scenario in which neural damage might impact the microvasculature is less defined. In this study, using an

Indexed as

capillariesendothelial cellsexcitotoxicityneuroprotectionneurovascularrecombinant proteinsretinaretinal ganglion cellsVEGFDVEGFR3

Identifiers

PMID32055648
PMCPMC7005343
OpenAlexW2997023896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.