Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055630›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2020

Mobile health application to support CPAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea: design, feasibility and perspectives.

Monique Suarez-Giron, Onintza Garmendia, Vera Lugo, Concepción Ruiz, Neus Salord, Xavier Alsina, Ramón Farré, Josep M Montserrat, Marta Torres

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05390138 (A Smart Sleep Apnea Self-management Support Programme), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05390138 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Smart Sleep Apnea Self-management Support Programme(4S) to Improve Apnea Severity and Cardiovascular Health - A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial With Mixed-method Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmsSmart Sleep Apnea Self-management Support Programme (4S), General Hygiene Information (GH)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Monique Suarez-GironLaboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Onintza GarmendiaLaboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Vera LugoLaboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Concepción RuizLaboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Neus SalordSleep Unit, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier AlsinaDept of Pneumology and Respiratory Allergy, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Ramón FarréCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
Josep M MontserratLaboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta TorresLaboratori del Son, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESDepartament de Salut · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices can be monitored remotely; however, in-person visits are kept for clinical follow-up in order to promote CPAP use and resolve potential side-effects. Mobile health is a promising way to provide remote and easy clinical control for CPAP follow-up and support. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance by obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients and healthcare professionals of a newly designed mobile app (Appnea-Q) to promote clinical control through a self-monitoring tool for patients with CPAP supervised by sleep professionals.

methodsAppnea-Q incorporates a simple follow-up questionnaire with automated responses, together with frequent problems and lifestyle recommendations sections. Feasibility, acceptance and usefulness were assessed. First, an internal validation was performed during outpatient CPAP follow-up visits with sleep professionals from various sleep units. Second, an external validation was performed in a subgroup of 15 patients at home.

resultsMost patients (n=75) considered the app useful and were willing to use it and recommend it (72-88%). Up to 64.87% agreed on its capacity to reduce hospital visits. Appnea-Q was rated as acceptable (79.37±19.29) by the system usability score. Sleep professionals (n=30) concurred on its usefulness for OSA patient follow-up, particularly during the first month of CPAP therapy. The external validation showed its feasibility among 11 out of 15 patients and their data were received accordingly on the professionals' web platform.

conclusionsAccording to our validation process, and the viewpoints of the patients and professionals, our new mobile app is a feasible and well-received tool for personal OSA management. Future clinical trials should substantiate its performance and cost-effectiveness in the clinical arena.

Identifiers

PMID32055630
PMCPMC7008136
OpenAlexW3004535506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.