Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055463›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2020

Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants.

Wesley Baas, Blake O'Connor, Charles Welliver, Peter J Stahl, Doron S Stember, Steven K Wilson, Tobias S Köhler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wesley BaasDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Blake O'ConnorDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Charles WelliverDivision of Urology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Peter J StahlDepartment of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Doron S StemberDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Steven K WilsonInstitute for Urologic Excellence, La Quinta, CA, USA.
Tobias S KöhlerDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPenile prosthesis implantation represents the gold standard of treatment for severe or medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). We sought to address the paucity of currently available literature about global penile prosthesis usage in regard to geography, patient age, surgical approach, implanter volume, and etiology of ED.

methodsFrom device manufacturer information, we compiled data on over 63,000 implants performed worldwide. Data was grouped and then analyzed to examine trends in penile implantation between the years of 2005-2012.

resultsThe number of implants was seen to steadily increase over the study period. Of the 63,013 total procedures recorded, 85.9% were performed within the United States. 60-78% of procedures were done using the penoscrotal (PS) approach, with only Belgium/Netherlands as an outlier with an infrapubic (INF) majority. The US was notable for having an increasing number of implanters doing 16-30, 31-50, or >100 implants yearly. Etiology of ED worldwide was variable, but "organic," post-prostatectomy, and diabetes accounted for the vast majority of cases worldwide.

conclusionsPenile prosthesis implantation is an increasing practice, as evidenced by a steady increase in the number of implants performed over a 7-year study period. Acceptance of this treatment option for ED is variable by region with the US leading the annual number of implantations by a wide margin. Worldwide, there appears to be a predominance of surgeons placing implants via the PS approach.

Indexed as

Erectile dysfunction (ED)penile implantpenile prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID32055463
PMCPMC6995940
OpenAlexW2990757445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.