Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055415›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2020

Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review.

Noreen Frisch, Pat Atherton, Mary M Doyle-Waters, Martha L P MacLeod, Anastasia Mallidou, Vanessa Sheane, John Ward, Jinelle Woodley

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noreen Frisch1School of Nursing, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC V8P5C2 Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1482-3617
Pat AthertonBC SUPPORT Unit, Suite 420 1367 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Mary M Doyle-WatersCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, 708 - 828 W. 10Th Avenue, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Martha L P MacLeod4University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC Canada.
Anastasia Mallidou1School of Nursing, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC V8P5C2 Canada.
Vanessa Sheane1School of Nursing, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC V8P5C2 Canada.
John WardBC SUPPORT Unit, Suite 420 1367 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Jinelle Woodley5Island Health Authority, 1952 Bay St, Victoria, BC Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

plain english summaryABSTRACT:

Indexed as

CompetenciesPatient and public involvementPatient engagement in researchPatient-oriented researchScoping review

Identifiers

PMID32055415
PMCPMC7011284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.