Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055408›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2020

Field cricket genome reveals the footprint of recent, abrupt adaptation in the wild.

Sonia Pascoal, Judith E Risse, Xiao Zhang, Mark Blaxter, Timothee Cezard, Richard J Challis, Karim Gharbi, John Hunt, Sujai Kumar, Emma Langan and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Competing adaptations maintain nonadaptive variation in a wild cricket population.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sonia PascoalDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.
Judith E RisseDivision of Bioinformatics, Department of Plant Sciences Wageningen University & Research Wageningen 6708 PB The Netherlands.
Xiao ZhangSchool of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews Fife KY16 9TH United Kingdom.
Mark BlaxterEdinburgh Genomics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JT United Kingdom.
Timothee CezardEdinburgh Genomics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JT United Kingdom.
Richard J ChallisEdinburgh Genomics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JT United Kingdom.
Karim GharbiEdinburgh Genomics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JT United Kingdom.
John HuntSchool of Science and Health and the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith NSW 2751 Australia.
Sujai KumarEdinburgh Genomics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JT United Kingdom.
Emma LanganEdinburgh Genomics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JT United Kingdom.
Xuan LiuCentre for Genomic Research University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 7ZB United Kingdom.
Jack G RaynerSchool of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews Fife KY16 9TH United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9259-9046
Michael G RitchieSchool of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews Fife KY16 9TH United Kingdom.
Basten L SnoekTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics Utrecht University Utrecht 3584 CH The Netherlands.
Urmi TrivediEdinburgh Genomics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH9 3JT United Kingdom.
Nathan W BaileySchool of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews Fife KY16 9TH United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary adaptation is generally thought to occur through incremental mutational steps, but large mutational leaps can occur during its early stages. These are challenging to study in nature due to the difficulty of observing new genetic variants as they arise and spread, but characterizing their genomic dynamics is important for understanding factors favoring rapid adaptation. Here, we report genomic consequences of recent, adaptive song loss in a Hawaiian population of field crickets (

Indexed as

Adaptationfeminizationgenomicsrapid evolutionsexual signalingtrait loss

Identifiers

PMID32055408
PMCPMC7006468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.