Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055407›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2020

Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species' responses to climate change.

Ann-Marie Waldvogel, Barbara Feldmeyer, Gregor Rolshausen, Moises Exposito-Alonso, Christian Rellstab, Robert Kofler, Thomas Mock, Karl Schmid, Imke Schmitt, Thomas Bataillon and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ann-Marie WaldvogelSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-0766
Barbara FeldmeyerSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-7245
Gregor RolshausenSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt am Main Germany.
Moises Exposito-AlonsoDepartment of Plant Biology Carnegie Institution for Science Stanford California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-0700
Christian RellstabSwiss Federal Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-5975
Robert KoflerInstitute of Population Genetics Vetmeduni Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9960-7248
Thomas MockSchool of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-0362
Karl SchmidInstitute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics University of Hohenheim Stuttgart Germany.
Imke SchmittSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt am Main Germany.
Thomas BataillonBioinformatics Research Center Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4730-2538
Outi SavolainenDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Finland.
Alan BerglandDepartment of Biology University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia.
Thomas FlattDepartment of Biology University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5990-1503
Frederic GuillaumeDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zürich Zürich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-0081
Markus PfenningerSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-7245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global climate change (GCC) increasingly threatens biodiversity through the loss of species, and the transformation of entire ecosystems. Many species are challenged by the pace of GCC because they might not be able to respond fast enough to changing biotic and abiotic conditions. Species can respond either by shifting their range, or by persisting in their local habitat. If populations persist, they can tolerate climatic changes through phenotypic plasticity, or genetically adapt to changing conditions depending on their genetic variability and census population size to allow for de novo mutations. Otherwise, populations will experience demographic collapses and species may go extinct. Current approaches to predicting species responses to GCC begin to combine ecological and evolutionary information for species distribution modelling. Including an evolutionary dimension will substantially improve species distribution projections which have not accounted for key processes such as dispersal, adaptive genetic change, demography, or species interactions. However, eco-evolutionary models require new data and methods for the estimation of a species' adaptive potential, which have so far only been available for a small number of model species. To represent global biodiversity, we need to devise large-scale data collection strategies to define the ecology and evolutionary potential of a broad range of species, especially of keystone species of ecosystems. We also need standardized and replicable modelling approaches that integrate these new data to account for eco-evolutionary processes when predicting the impact of GCC on species' survival. Here, we discuss different genomic approaches that can be used to investigate and predict species responses to GCC. This can serve as guidance for researchers looking for the appropriate experimental setup for their particular system. We furthermore highlight future directions for moving forward in the field and allocating available resources more effectively, to implement mitigation measures before species go extinct and ecosystems lose important functions.

Indexed as

Biodiversity losseco‐evolutionary dynamicsgenomic quantitative geneticsmodels

Identifiers

PMID32055407
PMCPMC7006467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.