Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055389›Full record

ArticleChemical science2019

A quantitative assessment of the dynamic modification of lipid-DNA probes on live cell membranes.

Yousef Bagheri, Sara Chedid, Fatemeh Shafiei, Bin Zhao, Mingxu You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA-modulated dimerization and oligomerization of cell membrane receptors.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recent developments in DNA-based mechanical nanodevices.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Interactions of Amyloid-β with Membrane Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yousef BagheriDepartment of Chemistry , University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA 01003 , USA . Email: mingxuyou@umass.edu ; Email: bzhao@umass.edu.
Sara ChedidDepartment of Chemistry , University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA 01003 , USA . Email: mingxuyou@umass.edu ; Email: bzhao@umass.edu.
Fatemeh ShafieiDepartment of Chemistry , University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA 01003 , USA . Email: mingxuyou@umass.edu ; Email: bzhao@umass.edu.
Bin ZhaoDepartment of Chemistry , University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA 01003 , USA . Email: mingxuyou@umass.edu ; Email: bzhao@umass.edu.
Mingxu YouDepartment of Chemistry , University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA 01003 , USA . Email: mingxuyou@umass.edu ; Email: bzhao@umass.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-2340

Funding

Defining Mechanical Landscapes at Cell-Cell JunctionsR35GM133507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI Mingxu You · 2019 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lipid-DNA probes have recently attracted much attention for cell membrane analysis, transmembrane signal transduction, and regulating intercellular networks. These lipid-DNA probes can spontaneously insert onto plasma membranes simply after incubation. The highly precise and controllable DNA interactions have further allowed the programmable manipulation of these membrane-anchored functional probes. However, we still have quite limited understanding of how these lipid-DNA probes interact with cell membranes and also what parameters determine this process. In this study, we have systematically studied the dynamic process of cell membrane modification with a group of lipid-DNA probes. Our results indicated that the hydrophobicity of the lipid-DNA probes is strongly correlated with their membrane insertion and departure rates. Most cell membrane insertion stems from the monomeric form of probes, rather than the aggregates. Lipid-DNA probes can be removed from cell membranes through either endocytosis or direct outflow into the solution. As a result, long-term probe modifications on cell membranes can be realized in the presence of excess probes in the solution and/or endocytosis inhibitors. For the first time, we have successfully improved the membrane persistence of lipid-DNA probes to more than 24 h. Our quantitative data have dramatically improved our understanding of how lipid-DNA probes dynamically interact with cell membranes. These results can be further used to allow a broad range of applications of lipid-DNA probes for cell membrane analysis and regulation.

Identifiers

PMID32055389
PMCPMC7003967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.