Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32055116›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology

Mechanical Thrombectomy: Answering Unanswered.

Rajsrinivas Parthasarathy, Vipul Gupta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06721338 (Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Utilizing Reversal Flow), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06721338 phase1terminatednot on this map

Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Utilizing Reversal Flow

TypeinterventionalSponsorMediSys Health NetworkRan2025 to 2025Enrolled3ConditionsStroke, Large Vessel OcclusionArmsMechanical thrombectomy via blood flow reversal using BOBBY balloon guide catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajsrinivas ParthasarathyDepartment of Stroke and Neurointerventional Surgery, Artemis Agrim Institute of Neuroscience, Gurgaon, India.
Vipul GuptaDepartment of Stroke and Neurointerventional Surgery, Artemis Agrim Institute of Neuroscience, Gurgaon, India.
Artemis Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stroke physician community witnessed a major "breakthrough" in acute stroke therapeutics when the results of the first of the many positive trials, "MR CLEAN," were published showing a significant absolute benefit in favor of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Thereafter, the investigators of ESCAPE, SWIFT PRIME, REVASCAT, THRACE, and PISTE concluded the same. Based on the initial studies, the American Stroke Association amended the 2013 guidelines in 2015 to include mechanical thrombectomy as the standard of care in patients with LVO presenting within six hours. In the past year, the horizon was further expanded when two major landmark trials, DAWN and DEFUSE 3, established the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy in the delayed window period in a select group of patients. It further led to the inclusion of the delayed window period treatment strategies in the 2018 guidelines. However, there are many unanswered questions in scenarios like small deficit with LVO, borderline large core, wake-up stroke (WUS), tandem occlusion, imaging of choice, conscious sedation (CS) versus general anesthesia (GA), and choice of technique. In our review, we aim to answer these questions along with a schematic representation of current techniques used in stroke thrombectomy.

Indexed as

ASPECTSlarge corelow NIHSSmechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID32055116
PMCPMC7001454
OpenAlexW2980916973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.