Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054919›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The production and application of carbon nanomaterials from high alkali silicate herbaceous biomass.

Ahmed I Osman, Charlie Farrell, Ala'a H Al-Muhtaseb, John Harrison, David W Rooney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bibliometric analysis of the research landscape on rice husks gasification (1995-2019).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmed I OsmanSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland, UK. aosmanahmed01@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2788-7839
Charlie FarrellSouth West College, Cookstown, Co, Tyrone, BT80 8DN, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2816-5491
Ala'a H Al-MuhtasebDepartment of Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. muhtaseb@squ.edu.om.
John HarrisonSouth West College, Cookstown, Co, Tyrone, BT80 8DN, Northern Ireland, UK.
David W RooneySchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBSouth West College · GBSultan Qaboos University · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, value-added materials such as activated carbon and carbon nanotubes were synthesized from low-value Miscanthus × giganteus lignocellulosic biomass. A significant drawback of using Miscanthus in an energy application is the melting during the combustion due to its high alkali silicate content. An application of an alternative approach was proposed herein for synthesis of activated carbon from Miscanthus × giganteus, where the produced activated carbon possessed a high surface area and pore volume of 0.92 cm

Identifiers

PMID32054919
PMCPMC7018825
OpenAlexW3006207904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.