Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054901›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Individual variation in the attribution of incentive salience to social cues.

Christopher J Fitzpatrick, Jonathan D Morrow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J FitzpatrickNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jonathan D MorrowNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jonmorro@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-4544
University of Michigan · US

Funding

NIDA Training Program in Neuroscience-Administrative SupplementT32DA007281 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Shelly Beth Flagel · 1995 to 2026
$5.7M
Individual Differences in Epigenetic Regulation of Emotional LearningR01DA044960 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORROW, JONATHAN DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Neural Circuitry of Shared Vulnerability to Both PTSD and AddictionK08DA037912 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORROW, JONATHAN DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$940k
NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA037912NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044960NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on the attribution of incentive salience to drug cues has furthered our understanding of drug self-administration in animals and addiction in humans. The influence of social cues on drug-seeking behavior has garnered attention recently, but few studies have investigated how social cues gain incentive-motivational value. In the present study, a Pavlovian conditioned approach (PCA) procedure was used to identify rats that are more (sign-trackers; STs) or less (goal-trackers; GTs) prone to attribute incentive salience to food reward cues. In Experiment 1, a novel procedure employed social 'peers' to compare the tendency of STs and GTs to attribute incentive salience to social reward cues as well as form a social-conditioned place preference. In Experiment 2, social behavior of STs and GTs was compared using social interaction and choice tests. Finally, in Experiment 3, levels of plasma oxytocin were measured in STs and GTs seven days after the last PCA training session, because oxytocin is known to modulate the mesolimbic reward system and social behavior. Compared to GTs, STs attributed more incentive salience to social-related cues and exhibited prosocial behaviors (e.g., social-conditioned place preference, increased social interaction, and social novelty-seeking). No group differences were observed in plasma oxytocin levels. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate individual variation in the attribution of incentive salience to both food- and social-related cues, which has important implications for the pathophysiology of addiction.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AddictiveBehavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalFoodMaleMotivationOxytocinRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardSocial BehaviorOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID32054901
PMCPMC7018846
OpenAlexW3005608080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.