Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054834›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Improved betulinic acid biosynthesis using synthetic yeast chromosome recombination and semi-automated rapid LC-MS screening.

G-O F Gowers, S M Chee, D Bell, L Suckling, M Kern, D Tew, D W McClymont, T Ellis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G-O F GowersImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8827-4465
S M CheeLondon Biofoundry, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
D BellLondon Biofoundry, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-0157
L SucklingLondon Biofoundry, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
M KernGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, UK.
D TewGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-1248
D W McClymontLondon Biofoundry, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
T EllisImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. t.ellis@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-976X
Imperial College London · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L027852/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M025632/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P504579/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R002614/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology, genome engineering and directed evolution offer innumerable tools to expedite engineering of strains for optimising biosynthetic pathways. One of the most radical is SCRaMbLE, a system of inducible in vivo deletion and rearrangement of synthetic yeast chromosomes, diversifying the genotype of millions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in hours. SCRaMbLE can yield strains with improved biosynthetic phenotypes but is limited by screening capabilities. To address this bottleneck, we combine automated sample preparation, an ultra-fast 84-second LC-MS method, and barcoded nanopore sequencing to rapidly isolate and characterise the best performing strains. Here, we use SCRaMbLE to optimise yeast strains engineered to produce the triterpenoid betulinic acid. Our semi-automated workflow screens 1,000 colonies, identifying and sequencing 12 strains with between 2- to 7-fold improvement in betulinic acid titre. The broad applicability of this workflow to rapidly isolate improved strains from a variant library makes this a valuable tool for biotechnology.

Indexed as

Genes, SyntheticBetulinic AcidBiotechnologyChromatography, LiquidChromosomes, FungalDirected Molecular EvolutionGene LibraryGenetic Association StudiesGenetic EngineeringGenetic TestingGenome, FungalMass SpectrometryPentacyclic TriterpenesRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSynthetic BiologyBetulinic AcidPentacyclic TriterpenesTriterpenes

Identifiers

PMID32054834
PMCPMC7018806
OpenAlexW3006621387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.