ReviewBlood cancer journal2020
Developments in continuous therapy and maintenance treatment approaches for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Review in Blood cancer journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy and safety of combined anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- A Novel Digital Educational Strategy Improves Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Trial
- Sequencing T-cell redirection therapies leads to deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone plus transplant in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Blood · 2020Trial
- Trial
- A bibliometric analysis of the research landscape of lenalidomide resistance in multiple myeloma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Prediction of ISS and R-ISS Stratification in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Using Lumbar Spine MRI Radiomics Model: A Two-Center Multimodal Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Development of Drug-in-Adhesive Patch Formulation for Transdermal Delivery of Pelubiprofen.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Outcomes following different upfront stem cell transplantation strategies for multiple myeloma: a statistical perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy of maintenance or consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma based on proteasome inhibitors: a meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Effects of mesenchymal stem cells from different sources on the biological functions of multiple myeloma cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- The Functional Transcriptomic Landscape Informs Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma.Cancer research · 2025Article
- Advantage of Tolerability following Arsenic Trioxide-VTD vs VRD in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a prospective, open-label study.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Stackelberg Evolutionary Games of Cancer Treatment: What Treatment Strategy to Choose if Cancer Can be Stabilized?Dynamic games and applications · 2025Article
- Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Outcomes and Management.Advances in hematology · 2025Review
- Lenalidomide, ixazomib, or daratumumab maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma.Blood neoplasia · 2024Article
- Impact of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone induction on patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and renal impairment: Results from the Connect® MM Registry.Blood cancer journal · 2024Observational
- T Cell-Redirecting Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: Optimal Dosing Schedule and Duration of Treatment.Blood cancer discovery · 2024Review
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 19 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The evolving paradigm of continuous therapy and maintenance treatment approaches in multiple myeloma (MM) offers prolonged disease control and improved outcomes compared to traditional fixed-duration approaches. Potential benefits of long-term strategies include sustained control of disease symptoms, as well as continued cytoreduction and clonal control, leading to unmeasurable residual disease and the possibility of transforming MM into a chronic or functionally curable condition. "Continuous therapy" commonly refers to administering a doublet or triplet regimen until disease progression, whereas maintenance approaches typically involve single-agent or doublet treatment following more intensive prior therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or doublet, triplet, or even quadruplet induction therapy. However, the requirements for agents and regimens within these contexts are similar: treatments must be tolerable for a prolonged period of time, should not be associated with cumulative or chronic toxicity, should not adversely affect patients' quality of life, should ideally be convenient with a minimal treatment burden for patients, and should not impact the feasibility or efficacy of subsequent treatment at relapse. Multiple agents have been and are being investigated as long-term options in the treatment of newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), including the immunomodulatory drugs lenalidomide and thalidomide, the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, and the monoclonal antibodies daratumumab, elotuzumab, and isatuximab. Here we review the latest results with long-term therapy approaches in three different settings in NDMM: (1) maintenance treatment post ASCT; (2) continuous frontline therapy in nontransplant patients; (3) maintenance treatment post-frontline therapy in the nontransplant setting. We also discuss evidence from key phase 3 trials. Our review demonstrates how the paradigm of long-term treatment is increasingly well-established across NDMM treatment settings, potentially resulting in further improvements in patient outcomes, and highlights key clinical issues that will need to be addressed in order to provide optimal benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.