Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054628›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

The extent to which family physicians record their patients' exercise in medical records: a scoping review.

Cliff Lindeman, Ashley McCurdy, Carminda G Lamboglia, Brendan Wohlers, Anh N Q Pham, Allison Sivak, John C Spence

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Metabolic Risks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Accuracy of Non-Exercise Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Japanese Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cliff LindemanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-265X
Ashley McCurdyFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Carminda G LambogliaFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Brendan WohlersFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Anh N Q PhamDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Allison SivakCoutts Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
John C SpenceFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada jc.spence@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8485-1336
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExercise is an effective modality for the prevention and treatment of chronic conditions and family physicians are the healthcare providers tasked to manage patients' chronic disease status. However, little is known about the exercise documentation in family-physician records. Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to describe family-physician-recorded exercise-related advice to patients in electronic medical records.

designScoping review.

settingPrimary care clinics. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Google, Dissertations & Theses Global, OCLC PapersFirst (via First Search) and included references were searched between 1 January 1990 and 10 June 2018. Extracted information included year, geographic origin, data input structure, input frequency and content of exercise inputs in family physicians' electronic medical records. The primary outcomes are the structure, purpose and frequency of inputs.

resultsOf a possible 1758 documents, 83 remained after a title and abstract scan and 22 after a full-text review. These documents included 32 findings of physical activity/exercise medical record documentation: counselling/advising patients (50.0%), status (12.5%), embedded questionnaires (12.5%), status as a risk factor (12.5%), health promotion documentation (6.3%), inactivity status (3.1%) and grading (3.1%). The frequency of exercise inputs in primary care records vary from as low as 0.4% of patients with documentation of physical activity health promotion inputs to as high as 87.8% of patients with exercise or physical activity status recorded. The majority of included documents (63.6%) were focused on patients with identified chronic conditions.

conclusionThe findings suggest that the structure and purpose of exercise documentation is often unclear or unspecified. Studies that present exercise information from family-physician medical records tend to focus on patients with specific chronic conditions and present little detail about the field from which information was extracted. The review found that the proportion of patients with physical activity or exercise information is often less than half.

Indexed as

DocumentationElectronic Health RecordsExerciseFamily PracticeHealth BehaviorPrimary Health CareHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'health informaticsprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID32054628
PMCPMC7044842
OpenAlexW3006143010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.