ArticleBMJ open2020
Rethinking rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a protocol of a multicentre cohort study on continuity of care, health literacy, adherence and costs at all care levels (the CONCARD
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Continuity of Care, Adherence to Treatment and Self-reported Health After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CONCARD): a Patient-centered Care Study
eCardiacRehab - a Pragmatic Trial on a Home-based Patient-centered e-Health Programme With Tailored Solutions - Feasibility Study
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-Creation and Usability Testing of a Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (eCardiacRehab): Design and Development Study.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- Insomnia symptoms in women and men after percutaneous coronary intervention - a prospective multicentre cohort study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Observational
- Article
- The Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Multidimensional Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Unstable Angina Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Emulated Target Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Article
- Perfect health not so perfect after all - a methodological study on patient-reported outcome measures in 2574 patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Postoperative kinesiophobia in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: a prospective study of psychological and social determinants.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Association between social support and life space mobility in older patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: mediating roles of health literacy and intrinsic capacity.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Use of health services and perceived need for information and follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- The quality of long-term counselling for percutaneous coronary intervention patients: A cross-sectional study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- The association of electronic health literacy with behavioural and psychological coronary artery disease risk factors in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a 12-month follow-up study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Article
- Article
- Intervention effect of encouraging mental and programmed nursing of patients in interventional operating room on their compliance and bad moods.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Virtual and in-person cardiac rehabilitation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Norwegian Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: is it just lifestyle?Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2020Article
- Continuity of care and its associations with self-reported health, clinical characteristics and follow-up services after percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC health services research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) aims to provide instant relief of symptoms, and improve functional capacity and prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Although patients may experience a quick recovery, continuity of care from hospital to home can be challenging. Within a short time span, patients must adjust their lifestyle, incorporate medications and acquire new support. Thus, CONCARD METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective multicentre cohort study organised in four thematic projects plans to include 3000 patients. All patients undergoing PCI at seven large PCI centres based in two Nordic countries are prospectively screened for eligibility and included in a cohort with a 1-year follow-up period including data collection of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and a further 10-year follow-up for adverse events. In addition to PROs, data are collected from patient medical records and national compulsory registries. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been granted by the Norwegian Regional Committee for Ethics in Medical Research in Western Norway (REK 2015/57), and the Data Protection Agency in the Zealand region (REG-145-2017). Findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and to patients through patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03810612.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.