Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054612›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Comparison of Aspiration versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy as the Preferred Strategy for Patients with Acute Terminal Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

P F Xing, P F Yang, Z F Li, L Zhang, H J Shen, Y X Zhang, Y W Zhang, J M Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Distal mechanical thrombectomy using beveled tip aspiration zoom catheters: A preliminary study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  14. High serum total cholesterol associated with good outcome in endovascular thrombectomy for acute large artery occlusion.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P F XingFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2663-1092
P F YangFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-3602
Z F LiFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-3786
L ZhangFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-6292
H J ShenFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4439-9506
Y X ZhangFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1525-5893
Y W ZhangFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9958-3098
J M LiuFrom the Department of Stroke Center, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. Liu118@vip.163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2768-7298
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere is no consensus on endovascular treatment for terminal ICA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of preferred aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy for revascularization in patients with isolated terminal ICA occlusion. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with terminal ICA occlusion treated with aspiration thrombectomy or stent retriever thrombectomy in our center, from September 2013 to November 2018. To minimize the case bias, propensity score matching was performed. The primary outcomes were successful reperfusion defined by expanded TICI grades 2b-3 at the end of all endovascular procedures and puncture-to-reperfusion time.

resultsA total of 109 consecutive patients with terminal ICA occlusion were divided into the aspiration thrombectomy group (40 patients) and the stent retriever thrombectomy group (69 patients), and 30 patients were included in each group after propensity score matching. The proportion of complete reperfusion was significantly higher in the aspiration thrombectomy group (OR 4.75 [95% CI, 1.10-1.38];

conclusionsFor the treatment of terminal ICA occlusion, aspiration thrombectomy was technically superior to stent retriever thrombectomy in the absence of a balloon guide catheter in achieving successful reperfusion with shorter puncture-to-reperfusion time and procedure-related adverse events.

Indexed as

AgedCarotid Artery, InternalEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParacentesisPropensity ScoreReperfusionRetrospective StudiesStentsStrokeThrombectomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32054612
PMCPMC7077898
OpenAlexW3006156397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.