ArticleStem cell research & therapy2020
Multipotency of mouse trophoblast stem cells.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic impact of human trophoblast stem cells in peritoneal and pneumonia-induced sepsis in mice.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Dynamic Changes of Immunoreactive CD34, CD117, and CD41 Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Human Placentas of Different Gestational Ages.Journal of developmental biology · 2025Article
- Current Status of Synthetic Mammalian Embryo Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The transcriptional activator Klf5 recruits p300-mediated H3K27ac for maintaining trophoblast stem cell pluripotency.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2024Article
- Intratracheal transplantation of trophoblast stem cells attenuates acute lung injury in mice.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Article
- Perinatal Derivatives: Where Do We Stand? A Roadmap of the Human Placenta and Consensus for Tissue and Cell Nomenclature.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn a number of disease processes, the body is unable to repair injured tissue, promoting the need to develop strategies for tissue repair and regeneration, including the use of cellular therapeutics. Trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) are considered putative stem cells as they differentiate into other subtypes of trophoblast cells. To identify cells for future therapeutic strategies, we investigated whether TSCs have properties of stem/progenitor cells including self-renewal and the capacity to differentiate into parenchymal cells of fetal organs, in vitro and in vivo.
methodsTSCs were isolated using anti-CD117 micro-beads, from embryonic day 18.5 placentas. In vitro, CD117
resultsWe first identified CD117
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that CD117
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.