ArticleBiology direct2020
Predictability of drug-induced liver injury by machine learning.
Article in Biology direct, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) to Assist Medicinal Chemistry.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Evolution of artificial intelligence and machine learning in DILI toxicogenomics: from descriptive profiling to mechanistic insights.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning to Predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Its Validation on Failed Drug Candidates in Development.Toxics · 2024Article
- Chemistry-Based Modeling on Phenotype-Based Drug-Induced Liver Injury Annotation: From Public to Proprietary Data.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Global mapping of cancers: The Cancer Genome Atlas and beyond.Molecular oncology · 2021Review
- The expression of ELOVL4, repressed by MYCN, defines neuroblastoma patients with good outcome.Oncogene · 2021Article
- Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Central vascular ligation and mesentery based abdominal surgery.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Low level of plasminogen increases risk for mortality in COVID-19 patients.Cell death & disease · 2021Article
- NUAK2 and RCan2 participate in the p53 mutant pro-tumorigenic network.Biology direct · 2021Article
- Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity Using SVM and Optimal Descriptor Sets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Predicting Antituberculosis Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Method: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Cell morphology-based machine learning models for human cell state classification.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- Polymorphism on human aromatase affects protein dynamics and substrate binding: spectroscopic evidence.Biology direct · 2021Article
- New immunological potential markers for triple negative breast cancer: IL18R1, CD53, TRIM, Jaw1, LTB, PTPRCAP.Discover oncology · 2021Article
- An ensemble learning approach for modeling the systems biology of drug-induced injury.Biology direct · 2021Article
- Integration of human cell lines gene expression and chemical properties of drugs for Drug Induced Liver Injury prediction.Biology direct · 2021Article
- Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using Machine Learning on a Diverse Set of Predictors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major concern in drug development, as hepatotoxicity may not be apparent at early stages but can lead to life threatening consequences. The ability to predict DILI from in vitro data would be a crucial advantage. In 2018, the Critical Assessment Massive Data Analysis group proposed the CMap Drug Safety challenge focusing on DILI prediction. METHODS AND
resultsThe challenge data included Affymetrix GeneChip expression profiles for the two cancer cell lines MCF7 and PC3 treated with 276 drug compounds and empty vehicles. Binary DILI labeling and a recommended train/test split for the development of predictive classification approaches were also provided. We devised three deep learning architectures for DILI prediction on the challenge data and compared them to random forest and multi-layer perceptron classifiers. On a subset of the data and for some of the models we additionally tested several strategies for balancing the two DILI classes and to identify alternative informative train/test splits. All the models were trained with the MAQC data analysis protocol (DAP), i.e., 10x5 cross-validation over the training set. In all the experiments, the classification performance in both cross-validation and external validation gave Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) values below 0.2. We observed minimal differences between the two cell lines. Notably, deep learning approaches did not give an advantage on the classification performance. DISCUSSION: We extensively tested multiple machine learning approaches for the DILI classification task obtaining poor to mediocre performance. The results suggest that the CMap expression data on the two cell lines MCF7 and PC3 are not sufficient for accurate DILI label prediction. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Maciej Kandula and Paweł P. Labaj.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.