Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054477›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2020

The use of complementary and alternative medicine in a multi-ethnic Asian population: results from the 2016 Singapore Mental Health Study.

Vanessa Seet, Edimansyah Abdin, Janhavi A Vaingankar, Shazana Shahwan, Sherilyn Chang, Bernard Lee, Siow Ann Chong, Mythily Subramaniam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa SeetResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore. ai_ling_SEET@imh.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-9938
Edimansyah AbdinResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Janhavi A VaingankarResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Shazana ShahwanResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Sherilyn ChangResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Bernard LeeMinistry of Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Siow Ann ChongResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Mythily SubramaniamResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Institute of Mental Health · SGMinistry of Health · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study seeks to investigate factors associated with using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for a mental illness among the three major ethnic groups (Chinese, Indians and Malays) in the general population of Singapore.

methodsData from the 2016 Singapore Mental Health Study was used; responses from the "Services" section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) administered during face-to-face household interviews with participants were analyzed to establish prevalence of CAM use among Singaporeans. Additionally, sociodemographic variables of interest were selected for sub-group regression analyses to yield correlates of CAM use among the three ethnic groups.

results6.4% of Singaporeans used at least one form of CAM in the past 12 months for their mental illness. Malays reported using CAM the most, followed by Indians and Chinese. Sociodemographic variables such as education and employment were differently associated with CAM use among the ethnicities. Across all three ethnic groups, CAM users were more likely to report poorer mental health-related quality of life.

conclusionDespite the significant differences in CAM use among Chinese, Malays and Indians, those who had a mental illness were significantly more likely to use CAM regardless of ethnicity. This highlights the need for communication between CAM practitioners and conventional mental healthcare providers for early referral when appropriate which would lead to improved healthcare delivery and better clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedComplementary TherapiesEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPrevalenceQuality of LifeSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultComplementary and alternative medicineEthnic differencesMental illnessPatterns of use

Identifiers

PMID32054477
PMCPMC7076843
OpenAlexW3012923611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.