Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054464›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Does the shoe really fit? Characterising ill-fitting footwear among community-dwelling older adults attending geriatric services: an observational cross-sectional study.

B O'Rourke, M E Walsh, R Brophy, S Vallely, N Murphy, B Conroy, C Cunningham, N F Horgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B O'RourkeSchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland. brianorourke@rcsi.ie.
M E WalshSchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
R BrophySchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
S VallelySchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
N MurphyPhysiotherapy Department, St James's hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
B ConroyRobert Mayne Day Hospital, St James's hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
C CunninghamMercers Institute for Successful Ageing (MISA), St James's hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
N F HorganSchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IESt. James's Hospital · IE

Funding

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Research Summer School (RSS) Programme Award (2017)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls in older people are common and can result in loss of confidence, fear of falling, restriction in activity and loss of independence. Causes of falls are multi-factorial. There is a paucity of research assessing the footwear characteristics among older people who are at high risk of falls, internationally and in the Irish setting. The aim of this study was to examine the proportion of older adults attending a geriatric day hospital in Ireland who were wearing incorrectly sized shoes.

methodsA consecutive sample of 111 older adults aged 60 years and over attending a geriatric day hospital in a large Irish teaching hospital was recruited. Demographic data including age, mobility, medications, co-habitation status, footwear worn at home and falls history were recorded. Shoe size and foot length were measured in millimetres using an internal shoe gauge and SATRA shoe size stick, respectively. Participants' self-reported shoe size was recorded. Footwear was assessed using the Footwear Assessment Form (FAF). A Timed Up and Go (TUG) score was recorded. Functional independence was assessed using the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) Scale. The primary outcome of interest in this study was selected as having footwear within the suggested range (10 to 15 mm) on at least one foot. Participants who met this definition were compared to those with ill-fitting footwear on both feet using Chi-square tests, T-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests.

resultsThe mean difference between shoe length and foot length was 18.6 mm (SD: 9.6 mm). Overall, 72% of participants were wearing footwear that did not fit correctly on both feet, 90% had shoes with smooth, partly worn or fully worn sole treading and 67% reported wearing slippers at home. Participant age, TUG score and NEADL score were not associated with ill-fitting footwear.

conclusionsWearing incorrectly fitting shoes and shoes with unsafe features was common among older adults attending geriatric day services in this study. A large number of participants reported wearing slippers at home.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsShoesActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFearFemaleHumansIndependent LivingIrelandMaleMiddle AgedAccidental fallsFootwear fitMobilityShoes

Identifiers

PMID32054464
PMCPMC7020372
OpenAlexW3008254988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.