Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054463›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Time-trends and correlates of obesity in Czech adolescents in relation to family socioeconomic status over a 16-year study period (2002-2018).

Erik Sigmund, Dagmar Sigmundová, Petr Badura, Jaroslava Voráčová, Hobza Vladimír, Tomáš Hollein, Jan Pavelka, Zuzana Půžová, Michal Kalman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Organized Sport Activities of 11 to 15-Year-Old Adolescents: Trends from 2010-2018 and Socioeconomic Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erik SigmundFaculty of Physical Culture, Institute of Active Lifestyle, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic. erik.sigmund@upol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5643-5586
Dagmar SigmundováFaculty of Physical Culture, Institute of Active Lifestyle, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Petr BaduraFaculty of Physical Culture, Institute of Active Lifestyle, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jaroslava VoráčováFaculty of Physical Culture, Department of Social Sciences in Kinanthropology, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Hobza VladimírFaculty of Physical Culture, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Tomáš HolleinFaculty of Physical Culture, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan PavelkaFaculty of Physical Culture, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Zuzana PůžováFaculty of Physical Culture, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Michal KalmanFaculty of Physical Culture, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, 771 11, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007294Grantová Agentura České Republiky 17-12579SMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LTT18020Technologická Agentura České Republiky TL01000335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main objective of the study is to analyse the changes in the prevalence of obesity among Czech adolescents between 2002 and 2018 with regard to the socioeconomic status (SES) of adolescents' families and to find SES-separated correlates of adolescents' obesity in 2018.

methodsA nationally representative sample of 29,879 adolescents (49.6% of them boys) aged 10.5-16.5 years was drawn from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire surveys conducted in 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018 in Czechia. Chi-square (χ

resultsAcross the quadrennial surveys from 2002 to 2018, we observed a clear increase in the prevalence of obesity in all SES categories of adolescents, which was most striking (p < 0.05) in adolescents with low SES (boys: + 7.5% points (p.p.); girls + 2.4 p.p.). When all the survey cycles were compared, the highest prevalence of obesity was evident in the low-SES adolescents in 2018, both in girls (5.1%) and boys (12.0%). Regardless of the adolescent SES category, the lower odds of obesity were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with regular vigorous physical activity (PA), participation in organized sport, and daily consumption of sweets. In addition, at least 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA significantly reduced the odds of obesity in adolescents of low and high SES categories.

conclusionsAn unreasonable increase in the prevalence of obesity in adolescents with low SES highlights the need to prevent obesity in adolescents with a low-SES background. Additionally, significantly higher odds of obesity in 11- and 13-year-old adolescents from low-SES families, compared with their peers aged 15, indicated an expectable rise in obesity in older low-SES adolescents in the near future.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSocial ClassAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesCzech RepublicFemaleHumansMalePediatric ObesityPrevalenceRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsHealth behaviour of school-aged children studyObesityPhysical activitySocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID32054463
PMCPMC7020383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.