Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054461›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2020

Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in Brazil.

Patricia de Moraes Mello Boccolini, Cristiano Siqueira Boccolini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia de Moraes Mello BoccoliniFaculdade de Medicina de Petrópolis, FASE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. patriciaboccolini@yahoo.com.br.
Cristiano Siqueira BoccoliniInstituto de Informação e Comunicação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-9142
Faculdade de Medicina de Petrópolis · BRInstituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of medicinal plants or other alternative practices can be the only therapeutic resources for many communities and ethnic groups, especially in developing countries. In Brazil, the Ministry of Health incorporated Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) as a public health policy since 2006. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of CAM use in Brazil.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study performed as an epidemiological survey, with data from the National Health Survey, 2013 that evaluated a sample of adult Brazilians (18+ years old). The outcome was the use of CAM therapies, such as acupuncture, homeopathy, medicinal plants and herbal medicines in the last 12 months. We employed a logistic regression model (CI 95%) to evaluate the chances of CAM use.

resultsThe prevalence of CAM use in Brazil was 4.5%. The subjects with higher chances to use CAM were: women (AOR = 1.42), aged > 40 years (AOR = 1.64), with higher educational levels (AOR = 2.35), and residents at North (AOR = 2.02) and South (AOR = 1.67) regions of Brazil, all with p-value < 0.001. According to the socioeconomic status, subjects from upper classes had higher chances to use acupuncture and homeopathy when compared to the other classes, and individuals from lower classes had higher chances to use medicinal plants and herbal medicines. Almost half of all individuals reporting CAM use did so outside the health care system. The Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) was the least used funding for CAM when compared to other types of funding.

conclusionsWe recommend that the Ministry of Health invests in capacity building for health professionals who work with CAM, providing structure for those practices in health services, increasing the access of CAM therapies for SUS users, and improving the registering of information about those therapies, encouraging the use of CAM by the Brazilian population.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalAdolescentAdultBrazilComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHerbal MedicineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultComplementary therapiesEpidemiological surveysTraditional medicineUnified health system

Identifiers

PMID32054461
PMCPMC7076835
OpenAlexW3006636269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.